ESPN Shamelessly promoting “WBC” Belt and Undisputed - so what is Haney?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Motorcity Cobra
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2016
    • 32565
    • 1,106
    • 545
    • 963,610

    #41
    Originally posted by R-C
    WBC said that Loma is the real WBC champ at 135.

    And basically saying that Haney is the “regular champ “
    They told Bill and Devin Haney something different

    Comment

    • Inspired
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2019
      • 2925
      • 412
      • 85
      • 34,524

      #42
      Originally posted by TheCell8
      Haney shouldn't be the WBC champ in the first place...
      Yes, yes he does...he was mandatory to Loma..and Loma decided to go for the franchise belt to avoid him. Therefore as far as im concerned he ducked Haney and didn't honour the mandatory fight, under normal circumstances he would get stripped.
      i absolutely despise the wbc.

      Comment

      • uncle_ray
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 600
        • 31
        • 2
        • 14,547

        #43
        Both fraudulent belts IMO. Loma beat Campbell for a vacant belt coming off a few journeyman wins and Haney beat a Russian and Dominican no has ever heard of before or since for a vacant belt

        Let's just pretend this Loma Lopez fight is for that vacant belt and anything else is the Captain Crunch belt

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #44
          Originally posted by Al Broker
          We can be critical and joke about Fox not acknowledging WBO Champions but ESPN does the same dumb shet because its defacto sports platform is so mainstream and commercial that it doesn’t care for the purity?

          There must be consistency. If the WBC Franchise Champion and its perk doesn’t have to do mandos then it should mean that he or she isn’t the real champion. Does this mean Lopez automatically becomes Franchise Champion should he beat Lomachenko? What does Haney become?

          This fight is for the undisputed lightweight championship of the world. Any boxing fan who doesn't think so is an idiot. Haney is not a champion. He is one of those jr champions like Rocky Fielding that Canelo used to get a bogus title at 168.Haney is a top contender but has absolutely no claim to being the lightweight champion of the world. for Haney to be the real lightweight champion of the world he must beat the winner of the Loma vs Lopez fight. Loma worked hard to beat all other legit title belts holders so he could be the undisputed champion and he is one win away from achieving that goal and here you come trying to fuc that up. GTFO. Haney is defending his phony title against washed up old Gamboa who is coming into the fresh off a one sided KO loss. We will have an undisputed champ at 135 tonight so quit crying about it Loma hater.

          Comment

          • techliam
            Caneloweight Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2012
            • 5526
            • 371
            • 23
            • 42,424

            #45
            Originally posted by Mammoth
            Why are there only two "regular champs"?
            Don’t worry

            The WBC will make more and more. It’s fairly new

            Comment

            • brick wall
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 6480
              • 259
              • 35
              • 24,574

              #46
              so ****ingwhat? loma legitimately won the belt so he's the real champion. wbc happens to be corrupt and created a franchise belt to collect more sanctioning fees. in their rules though the franchise champion is at a higher level than the regular champ so what's so complicated in saying loma-lopez is for the undisputed title. if the wbc didn't pimped that franchise belt, loma is the regular champ and haney is still fighting bums and old past prime fighters

              Comment

              • OnlyBeingHonest
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 447
                • 86
                • 111
                • 17,452

                #47
                Instead of debating who is the champ because WBC is screwing with everyone while being greedy, we should stop acknowledgement of all their belts and make them irrelevant.

                Comment

                • Ray*
                  Be safe!!!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 44867
                  • 1,654
                  • 1,608
                  • 558,890

                  #48
                  Its disgraceful. Am only recognising Haney as the WBC champion.

                  Comment

                  • daggum
                    All time great
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 43922
                    • 4,771
                    • 3
                    • 166,270

                    #49
                    undisputed is ******. there is always going to be a dispute with so many belts, interim belts, mandos, contenders who are none of those, etc...hes fighting the best guy in the division. thats all. haney and the next best guy should fight for the next shot but thats not how boxing works and so we just have to guess who is the next best based on hype

                    Comment

                    • daggum
                      All time great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 43922
                      • 4,771
                      • 3
                      • 166,270

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Ray*
                      Its disgraceful. Am only recognising Haney as the WBC champion.
                      my point is why should anyone care who the wbc champ is? or who the wba champ is? etc etc...it literally doesnt mean anything. it means maybe you beat someone good or maybe not. it doenst give us enough info

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP