ESPN Shamelessly promoting “WBC” Belt and Undisputed - so what is Haney?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I funna say you acting like a female. Look at the video. They're displaying all 4 belts on the line and there's no mention of Lomachenko being a ''franchise champion.'' Imagine if in Charlo's last WBC defense Al Bernstein would say, ''nice defense by Jermall Charlo, but Canelo is the WBC Champion.'' do you get it? Since when do any of us parade Canelo being the WBC Champion at Middleweight? Most of us don't care for it because Sulaiman just announces perks that make no sense.Comment
-
That's rather insane, especially if they said ''that's how it should be.'' That's shameless marketing trying to rewrite history.Comment
-
Comment
-
How do you know if somebody is acting female when you've never gotten pussy your entire life, bro?I funna say you acting like a female. Look at the video. They're displaying all 4 belts on the line and there's no mention of Lomachenko being a ''franchise champion.'' Imagine if in Charlo's last WBC defense Al Bernstein would say, ''nice defense by Jermall Charlo, but Canelo is the WBC Champion.'' do you get it? Since when do any of us parade Canelo being the WBC Champion at Middleweight? Most of us don't care for it because Sulaiman just announces perks that make no sense.
But yeah, no, this isn't for undisputed. Sulaiman made a mess of things. Bit of a disservice to the Franchise Champions as well as Haney and Charlo if you ask me...Comment
-
Lol they made a big deal about his loss being a split decision before as well. Dude has a loss, they need to just live with it. Not the end of the world...Comment
-
Yes, sir. I thought it was a mistake first, but following it with the comments, sealed for me that it wasn't. I think Top Rank wants Loma to win this one too.
I got a Green K for saying Loma is undefeated!Comment
Comment