I think he is overrated by many. He will go to the hall of fame on the 1st ballot. He has done enough good fighting to go to the hall of fame on the earliest vote. All time great? Maybe to some but not to me. At what weight was he great? 140, 147, 154 or 160? To me he was not great at any weight especially not middleweight. He fought all his middleweight fights at a catchweight below the actual middleweight limit.
Do you think Miguel Cotto is underrated?
Collapse
-
Or Carlos Palomino...Comment
-
Nobody went to war like Miguel, he lost a close but coulda went any direction fight vs canelo, a fight that I would hope to see 20 round s instead. So either a 15 rounder or a rematch, these guys were TOUGH, too much warrior in them.
Against Floyd he held his own, VERY close fight.
Miguel beat margarito. He avenged that loss in definite fashion. The only person who dismantled him was Manny Pacquiao the greatest at the time.
Who cares about the sadam Ali match? Stuff happens.
So I have to ask my self this: the two front-runner s from the 21st century which I'm basing this assessment on, there was a fighter that lost to pac and money may. His name was Ricky hatton. Now the question I bring up was: does that make you pound for pound #3 for Miguel or Richard hatton. Who wins between these 2 3rd place coveters?
Hatton ONLY lost to the 2 very best: pac and money. Miguel ALSO lost to pac and money. So who mythologically goes down as pound for pound #3? Hatton- cotto, 2 atg's and legends and hofers, same era, weight class etc, one of the greatest fight that never happened.Comment
-
Cotto's probably a bit overated but he was a fan friendly fighter with lots of heart. The problem with Miguel was as he moved up in weight he became less effective until finally, through some clever matchmaking, Miguel became, arguably, the weakest MW champ in modern history.
That said Miguel is a legitimate Hall of Famer but not an ATG.Comment
-
He is not underrated , actually might be slightly overrated.Things could have been different but I think that 1st Margarito took a lot out of him and he was never the same.He had some solid wins , but lost his biggest fights Margarito (he cheated) still an L though, lost to Pac, lost to Floyd, lost to Canelo .Comment
-
I think Cottos overall boxing IQ is widely overlooked. Cotto is a greatbboxer to study technique from. His athleticism + his mastery of the basics makes him a great model for young boxers.Comment
-
Nobody went to war like Miguel, he lost a close but coulda went any direction fight vs canelo, a fight that I would hope to see 20 round s instead. So either a 15 rounder or a rematch, these guys were TOUGH, too much warrior in them.
Against Floyd he held his own, VERY close fight.
Miguel beat margarito. He avenged that loss in definite fashion. The only person who dismantled him was Manny Pacquiao the greatest at the time.
Who cares about the sadam Ali match? Stuff happens.
So I have to ask my self this: the two front-runner s from the 21st century which I'm basing this assessment on, there was a fighter that lost to pac and money may. His name was Ricky hatton. Now the question I bring up was: does that make you pound for pound #3 for Miguel or Richard hatton. Who wins between these 2 3rd place coveters?
Hatton ONLY lost to the 2 very best: pac and money. Miguel ALSO lost to pac and money. So who mythologically goes down as pound for pound #3? Hatton- cotto, 2 atg's and legends and hofers, same era, weight class etc, one of the greatest fight that never happened.
Marquez ranks higher than bothComment
-
Comment
-
Comment