Name a win in boxing history that can’t be criticized

[KillaMane26]

Martinez vs Willams 2

[Froch_uppercut]

Froch V Bute.

Underdog V unbeaten favourite.

I suppose the only criticism you could throw at that is that it was fought in UK, but still, a full dismantling of an avoided fighter.

[Santa_]

Rigo-Donaire.

[techliam]

Foreman-Moorer?

Moorer coming off the Holyfield win undefeated

Foreman coming off of a loss, unranked and old

[pasawayako]

Pac-sasakul - pac underdog by 3-1
Pac-barrera - pac undergdog by 2-1
Pac-ledwaba- pac underdog by 10-1

[TheMyspaceDayz]

Ortiz VS Flores

[Truth Seeker]

Pac-sasakul - pac underdog by 3-1
Pac-barrera - pac undergdog by 2-1
Pac-ledwaba- pac underdog by 10-1

Pacquiao is a true legend. Blood of a king.

[Pac=Duran]

Fury Wilder part 2

Lol this.

Also Buster Douglas over Tyson. Buster had all the disadvantages but still one.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Toney beating Nunn

[abracada]

I’m going with Jack Johnson over Tommy Burns.

I have no idea how you criticize that victory.

I think every other victory in boxing history can be criticized. My evidence is this message board.

Thoughts?

Canelo v Kovalev