All will be criticized, because most boxing fans are like petty women.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Name a win in boxing history that can’t be criticized
Collapse
-
Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View PostI’m going with Jack Johnson over Tommy Burns.
I have no idea how you criticize that victory.
I think every other victory in boxing history can be criticized. My evidence is this message board.
Thoughts?
Boom.
Criticized.
Comment
-
-
-
-
For me I’d say these are some great wins but they are discredited as well. Like I said before people will ALWAYS find a reason to discredit greatness.
Floyd Mayweather beating Genaro Hernandez at 130. Genaro was 38-1 and only lost to Oscar in a fight where he went in with a nose injury. He was 12-0 at 130 and Floyd was literally a kid at this point.
Lennox Lewis beating Holyfield - Lewis literally won 10 or 11 rounds in the first fight against a guy that was the 2nd best HW in the world at the time. Haters will say Holyfield had heart problems, Holyfield was old etc etc. It’s still a great win to me.
Marquez KOing Pacquiao - Not so much that he won as I had him clearing winning 2-3 but the way he won. He knew he was going to get screwed on the cards so changed his style and beat a brawler at his own game. People even discredit this saying he was on PED’s conveniently ignoring the fact that pretty much everyone was saying the same about Pacquiao but I guess it was okay for him to do it. This is also notable for being one of the most brutal knockouts ever in boxing. People at ringside literally thought he might have been dead. It was nasty and painful to watch even if you’re not a Pacquiao fan (I’m not). But I didn’t enjoy seeing that. It was nasty and very brutal.
Comment
-
-
-
-
Comment