Name a win in boxing history that can’t be criticized

[PRINCEKOOL]

Chris Eubank vs Nigel Benn I.

People may mock Chris Eubank 'But he won his biggest fight'.

In a boxers career? There is usually a moment, which is a pivotal moment in their careers. That 1 fight change Eubank's trajectory of his entire career 'He had to win that fight, and he did'.

[SN!PER]

Hagler vs. Hearns

[Marchegiano]

It is difficult to criticize Burns, but, he did win his title off a guy who won his title from in an election match. Jeffries did just choose who would fight for his vacant title. Hart was meant to lose actually. To the last guy who beat him, Jack Root. Ironically, Burns had just lost his bid for MW champion and moved up to HW.

That said, Hart taking the measure of Johnson before his reign and Maher after Burns won does kind of prove Hart's abilities juxtaposed to his place in time. There really was no better choice at the time.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Leonard-Hearns. Both at the top of their game.

[Sctrojan]

Oscar vs El Feroz...most recently, zepeda vs baranchyk lol

[alexnation]

There is none. Every fight in history can be criticized for something. Some people make it their life purpose (some NSB'ers for sure)

[boogbx]

Haggler- Hearns

Roy Jones - Virgil Hill

Sergio Martínez- Paul Williams rematch.