Mayweather wins fighter if the decade yahoo.com

[IceTrayDaGang]

Canelo deserves the award clearly imo

i dont mind that at all... in fact, i actually said canelo will win it. but they're some posters on here saying canelo's positive test should automatically disqualify him from this. so?

[djtmal]

Floyd beat Pac and Canelo.

No one has better wins this decade than that.

Two fights in a decade and nobody has wins better than Floyd beating an already sparked out Pac in the most lackluster event in the history of boxing? Canelo ok that was a decent win I won't s**t on that but nobody has done nothing better in a ten year stretch? That's the best boxing has to offer? Shows just how low the standards are.

I think you cats confuse big events with prime vs. prime competition.

[ShoulderRoll]

Two fights in a decade and nobody has wins better than Floyd beating an already sparked out Pac in the most lackluster event in the history of boxing? Canelo ok that was a decent win I won't s**t on that but nobody has done nothing better in a ten year stretch? That's the best boxing has to offer? Shows just how low the standards are.

I think you cats confuse big events with prime vs. prime competition.

Pac just beat Keith Thurman.

Makes Floyd's win look better and better.

[The Big Dunn]

losses dont really mean anything, it's what he accomplished after those loss. this is NOT an award for the best record!!! this is an award for the best fighter of the decade. so it's what you do in the whole decade will determine if you'll win it or not. you cant be bringing up losses and shiiet. if we go by records, then they're some undefeated boxers that we aint never even heard of, should they win FOTD then?

Losses have to count. That’s how we differentiate between the best.

We aren’t comparing an undefeated guy like wilder to manny because he hasn’t fought anywhere near the same caliber of fighter.

However, when comparing Floyd and manny, they not only fought each other but many of the same opponents.

If you can cite “manny beat them better”, then it should also count if he lost.

Your resume is everyone you fought, not just everyone you beat.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Pac just beat Keith Thurman.

Makes Floyd's win look better and better.

and that's why manny is leading the race. it's what you accomplished in that whole decade. you have to put the work in to win the award, you cant half-assed it and retired half way into the decade and expect to still win it lol.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Losses have to count. That’s how we differentiate between the best.

We aren’t comparing an undefeated guy like wilder to manny because he hasn’t fought anywhere near the same caliber of fighter.

However, when comparing Floyd and manny, they not only fought each other but many of the same opponents.

If you can cite “manny beat them better”, then it should also count if he lost.

Your resume is everyone you fought, not just everyone you beat.

losses dont really mean much. it's what a fighter accomplished in that whole decade. like i said, if it's all about records, then they're some undefeated boxers who fought bums, should they win the award? lol.. jesus! this is not an award for the best record of the decade.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Losses have to count. That’s how we differentiate between the best.

We aren’t comparing an undefeated guy like wilder to manny because he hasn’t fought anywhere near the same caliber of fighter.

However, when comparing Floyd and manny, they not only fought each other but many of the same opponents.

If you can cite “manny beat them better”, then it should also count if he lost.

Your resume is everyone you fought, not just everyone you beat.

so if we go by this, and count the loss manny has, we also have to count the win he accomplished after those loss. so if you add those up, he outdid floyd. this is an award for FOTD, not an award for the fighter with the best record or best win.

[ShoulderRoll]

and that's why manny is leading the race. it's what you accomplished in that whole decade. you have to put the work in to win the award, you cant half-assed it and retired half way into the decade and expect to still win it lol.

Floyd beat Pac head to head.

Also beat Canelo head to head.

Neither guy can be ranked above him as a result.

Also...the biggest, financial record-breaking events in boxing history happened during this decade and all involved Floyd.

Which furthers adds to his legacy.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Losses have to count. That’s how we differentiate between the best.

We aren’t comparing an undefeated guy like wilder to manny because he hasn’t fought anywhere near the same caliber of fighter.

However, when comparing Floyd and manny, they not only fought each other but many of the same opponents.

If you can cite “manny beat them better”, then it should also count if he lost.

Your resume is everyone you fought, not just everyone you beat.

so let's see... from 2010-2015 which is the year floyd is active in.. he fought --

mosley
ortiz
cotto
guerrero
canelo
maidanax2
manny
berto

now with manny from 2010-2015

margarito
mosley
marquezx2
rios
bradleyx2
algeri
floyd
vargas

then 2015-2019, manny fought --

bradley
vargas
horn
lucas
broner
thurman

so you can clearly see manny outdid floyd... now if the award was from 2010-2015, then floyd will have a good case of winning it, but that's not the case here.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Floyd beat Pac head to head.

Also beat Canelo head to head.

Neither guy can be ranked above him as a result.

Also...the biggest, financial record-breaking events in boxing history happened during this decade and all involved Floyd.

Which furthers adds to his legacy.

the award is for fighter of the decade!!! not fighter with the best win! MESSSSAGE!