Deontay Wilder vs Top Ten Officially Ranked Fighters

[Toffee]

You don't need to write an essay to discuss Wilder's top ten opponents.

A couple of bullet points does just fine.

[REDEEMER]

The same TBRB who say Fury isn't lineal and Wilder is number one currently?

Fury isn’t lineal and Wilder is number one right now according to them Because of defeating their higher ranked Ortiz , you would know this if you knew what was going on that’s why AJ was at number one so long on their ranking system defeating far better opponents ,only a loss brought him down for now.

Wilder should enjoy his ranking here because it won’t last not much longer ,it’s still a legit ranking system however and one that shows Wilder has only one win against a top 10 guy and that’s before he was champion. Ha

Posters don’t like responding back to you because they know you’re probably the most bizarre and incoherent poster on here,so this to is my last one on this idiotic thread which was pointless as is most Wilder ones .if the OP himself doesn’t include any type of counter arguments ? Ha

[Kezzer]

Why are you trying to defend wilder in such a silly way. You can argue wilder has knockout power, you might argue he has the single biggest punch in the current division. You could even choose to argue you think he should be number one at this moment in time.

To argue wilders resume is as strong , or anywhere near Joshua though - well that’s just silly.

Nobody needs to point out which of those names are just silly. We all know the two big names Wilder has fought is Fury and Ortiz.

Fury he drew against (with some help from he judges its fair to say) and against Ortiz he used that knockout power to overcome fights he was losing.

Simple as that.

[Madison Boxing]

Im sorry but I'm not impressed with that list? The best guy on there had only ever beat bryant jennings and was also 40.

[MisterPullman]

So, what I got from this thread is Joshua fans are either too ****** or too lazy to actually respond.


Yes, they are mostly WBC, I think there's a WBA ranking somewhere in there.

Yes, it isn't compared very nicely to Joshua's resume


Those are my points you ****** pricks, make your own

Don't bother until February when Fury decides to do WWE full time

[Marchegiano]

Fury isn’t lineal and Wilder is number one right now according to them Because of defeating their higher ranked Ortiz , you would know this if you knew what was going on that’s why AJ was at number one so long on their ranking system defeating far better opponents ,only a loss brought him down for now.

Wilder should enjoy his ranking here because it won’t last not much longer ,it’s still a legit ranking system however and one that shows Wilder has only one win against a top 10 guy and that’s before he was champion. Ha

Posters don’t like responding back to you because they know you’re probably the most bizarre and incoherent poster on here,so this to is my last one on this idiotic thread which was pointless as is most Wilder ones .if the OP himself doesn’t include any type of counter arguments ? Ha

Because, Wilder didn't jump from unranked to number one. He has been ranked by the TBRB for sometime despite not having beaten TBRB ranked fighters.

Y'all say it's not right to be impressed with Wilder, he's a bum, fraud, and hypejob. Then you say the WBC ratings don't matter because TBRB ratings have more integrity followed by Wilder hasn't fought many TBRB ranked fighters despite him being ranked by TBRB. I don't really think I need to make a follow up comment for you to get my point here. They're the ones with integrity are they?

Far as lineal, TBRB has some made up rules they pulled out of their ass they adhere to.

I never said people don't respond to me...plenty responded, read their posts, they just assumed I'm bragging about Wilder. They're useless responses. Like, not even contrary like yours, just, useless.

[Marchegiano]

You don't need to write an essay to discuss Wilder's top ten opponents.

A couple of bullet points does just fine.

That is fair

[garfios]

It doesn't matter how laughable his resume is. If they ever meet inside a ring, Wilder is going to knock the british out.

[Fanofreason]

Wlad, Parker, Ruiz, Povetkin, Whyte in half as many fights

Not a fan of Joshua but there really is no comparison

Ortiz and Fury trumps anyone on that list, AJ fought old Wlad, Old Povetkin. Ruiz LMAO. Parker and Whyte are no where on the level of Ortiz or Fury,

[champion4ever]

Name - Rank - Finish



Stiverne - C - UD

Molina - 9 - KO

Szpilka - 6 - KO

Arreola - 9 - KO

Washington - 10 - KO

Stiverne - 1 - KO

Ortiz - 3 - KO

Fury - 3 - Drawn

Breazeale - 4 - KO

Ortiz - 3 - KO

Fury - 3 - Not yet



I don't understand, quality wise, name staying power wise, Wilder's not even close to Joshua. So, why is it Joshua fans refuse to acknowledge Wilder's top ten wins outside of Ortiz? Why pretend like there's a full top ten worth a damn when we all know the top five are the only places with names anyone cares about and Joshua has done well to fight top fives, and, the men he's fought have remain top ten fighters longer.

What's the point in lying and stretching the truth when you already dominate that metric as is, just facts? Why belittle your argument with bull****?


I knew making a thread about Wilder's top rank fight would draw some Josh fans in to brag on Joshua. That's fine, have at it, but also, with such a one sided measuring tool explain why you'd bother trying to bury Wilder's defeat over a lackluster champion everyone saw as second to Wlad at best, his run at the bottom tens, or even the fact that Breazeale is certainly good enough to be considered legitimate given guys like Fujimoto share the same ranking board...rather than expose it.

You lot have done a better job covering up Wilder's caveats than Wilder ever could hope to. Seems to me there's no extra needed for a resume whore to make their choice, just post the truth.

That's all these bigoted and racist fans do with a white supremacist agenda is besmirch and smear Deontay Wilder's ring achievements, accomplishments and resume.