Tweet
Name - Rank - Finish
Stiverne - C - UD
Molina - 9 - KO
Szpilka - 6 - KO
Arreola - 9 - KO
Washington - 10 - KO
Stiverne - 1 - KO
Ortiz - 3 - KO
Fury - 3 - Drawn
Breazeale - 4 - KO
Ortiz - 3 - KO
Fury - 3 - Not yet
I don't understand, quality wise, name staying power wise, Wilder's not even close to Joshua. So, why is it Joshua fans refuse to acknowledge Wilder's top ten wins outside of Ortiz? Why pretend like there's a full top ten worth a damn when we all know the top five are the only places with names anyone cares about and Joshua has done well to fight top fives, and, the men he's fought have remain top ten fighters longer.
What's the point in lying and stretching the truth when you already dominate that metric as is, just facts? Why belittle your argument with bull****?
I knew making a thread about Wilder's top rank fight would draw some Josh fans in to brag on Joshua. That's fine, have at it, but also, with such a one sided measuring tool explain why you'd bother trying to bury Wilder's defeat over a lackluster champion everyone saw as second to Wlad at best, his run at the bottom tens, or even the fact that Breazeale is certainly good enough to be considered legitimate given guys like Fujimoto share the same ranking board...rather than expose it.
You lot have done a better job covering up Wilder's caveats than Wilder ever could hope to. Seems to me there's no extra needed for a resume whore to make their choice, just post the truth.
Stiverne - C - UD
Molina - 9 - KO
Szpilka - 6 - KO
Arreola - 9 - KO
Washington - 10 - KO
Stiverne - 1 - KO
Ortiz - 3 - KO
Fury - 3 - Drawn
Breazeale - 4 - KO
Ortiz - 3 - KO
Fury - 3 - Not yet
I don't understand, quality wise, name staying power wise, Wilder's not even close to Joshua. So, why is it Joshua fans refuse to acknowledge Wilder's top ten wins outside of Ortiz? Why pretend like there's a full top ten worth a damn when we all know the top five are the only places with names anyone cares about and Joshua has done well to fight top fives, and, the men he's fought have remain top ten fighters longer.
What's the point in lying and stretching the truth when you already dominate that metric as is, just facts? Why belittle your argument with bull****?
I knew making a thread about Wilder's top rank fight would draw some Josh fans in to brag on Joshua. That's fine, have at it, but also, with such a one sided measuring tool explain why you'd bother trying to bury Wilder's defeat over a lackluster champion everyone saw as second to Wlad at best, his run at the bottom tens, or even the fact that Breazeale is certainly good enough to be considered legitimate given guys like Fujimoto share the same ranking board...rather than expose it.
You lot have done a better job covering up Wilder's caveats than Wilder ever could hope to. Seems to me there's no extra needed for a resume whore to make their choice, just post the truth.
Comment