Lennox Lewis/Rahman 2 and court decided rematch clauses

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • W1LL
    Celtic Warrior
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 11851
    • 845
    • 916
    • 71,119

    #21
    People who keep going on about "only $9 million??!" make me cringe every time. If AJ/Hearn hadn't given Ruiz the opportunity, he would still be making a hundred grand fighting on undercards. If the rematch clause is concrete from Eddie's side, then Ruiz will have still profited massively from that two-fight deal. He has to fulfil the legally binding obligations that he willingly signed for.

    Comment

    • Ray*
      Be safe!!!
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 44867
      • 1,654
      • 1,608
      • 558,890

      #22
      I don’t think Ruiz is trying NOT to honour the rematch, he is however trying not to honour everything in the contract. We shall see how this plays out, I think a little mediation would help.

      Comment

      • juandabomb
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2005
        • 2629
        • 107
        • 0
        • 21,659

        #23
        Originally posted by ralex
        So back in 2001 Rahman was offered 17 Mil for the rematch and you fools think it’s okay for Ruiz to only get 9 Mil in 2019???

        Ruiz has every right to fight this bs
        he needs a new manager to better negotiate..LOL

        Comment

        • Eff Pandas
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 52129
          • 3,624
          • 2,147
          • 1,635,919

          #24
          Originally posted by sicko
          That is why Lawyers make a lot of money

          I doubt this even makes it to Court. Things have gone silent which usually means negotiations are happening behind the scenes which is great
          Tend to agree. If Eddie sues as OP suggests I suspect this gets uglier & maybe postponed & Andy will still get more money for fighting in a ********* country or it gets put elsewhere eventually anyway. Might be a good thing for Joshua doe. I'm anti-an immediate rematch, but if thats the move I think more time between fights is more helpful than less.

          But w/e just give Andy some extra money for dealing with the weird ass Saudi vibe & lets get rolling officially already.

          Comment

          • Motorcity Cobra
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 32565
            • 1,106
            • 545
            • 963,610

            #25
            Originally posted by kafkod
            But he is refusing to fight AJ on the terms he agreed to in the rematch clause. That's the issue.

            And to save you the trouble of asking .. no, I haven't seen the contract.
            You admit you haven't seen the contract AFTER saying you know what's in the contract. Do you see how silly you sound?

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #26
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
              You admit you haven't seen the contract AFTER saying you know what's in the contract. Do you see how silly you sound?
              Do you have to see something to know something? Only PBC tards are questioning what everyone knows about the contract, because they're tards with an agenda.

              Comment

              • kafkod
                I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2013
                • 24876
                • 2,213
                • 1,829
                • 405,373

                #27
                Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
                You admit you haven't seen the contract AFTER saying you know what's in the contract. Do you see how silly you sound?
                Where did I say I knew what was in the contract?

                Comment

                • Motorcity Cobra
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2016
                  • 32565
                  • 1,106
                  • 545
                  • 963,610

                  #28
                  Originally posted by W1LL
                  People who keep going on about "only $9 million??!" make me cringe every time. If AJ/Hearn hadn't given Ruiz the opportunity, he would still be making a hundred grand fighting on undercards. If the rematch clause is concrete from Eddie's side, then Ruiz will have still profited massively from that two-fight deal. He has to fulfil the legally binding obligations that he willingly signed for.
                  Do you think Ruiz is there reason this fight is worth a lot more than it would be if AJ had won and he'd be fighting someone not named Wilder or Fury?

                  Comment

                  • Motorcity Cobra
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2016
                    • 32565
                    • 1,106
                    • 545
                    • 963,610

                    #29
                    Originally posted by kafkod
                    Where did I say I knew what was in the contract?
                    You stated matter of factly he's not following the terms of the rematch clause. Then you admit you haven't seen the rematch clause. Those two statements don't add up

                    Comment

                    • kafkod
                      I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 24876
                      • 2,213
                      • 1,829
                      • 405,373

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra
                      You stated matter of factly he's not following the terms of the rematch clause. Then you admit you haven't seen the rematch clause. Those two statements don't add up
                      So do you believe Hearn is lying when he says the rematch clause gives him the right to choose the location of the fight?

                      If so, why do you believe that?

                      Have you seen the contract?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP