Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz on Rematch: Not Everything is Correct in The Contract

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
    It could be he's been told the contract wasn't drawn up or worded properly. Seems unlikely though,. I'm sure Eddie's lawyers know how to draw up a contract.
    Boy would that be the coup of the century if they wrote a contract that's not legally binding. Highly doubtful,but I guess it's within the realms of possibility. Ruiz could do whatever he wants if true.

    I'm pretty sure daddy Hearn would have to take over, as screwing up your biggest cash cow would make almost any CEO have to resign.

    As I said, I think the probability of an error is slightly above zero, but not by much, considering how much I'm sure he pays his legal team.

    I like Ruiz, but this does smack of little cowardice, either that or he's just getting some really dumb advice.

    Comment


    • #22
      Are you aj fanboys finished yet?
      It's called negotiating. It's what happens after aj getting tko and quitting.

      Ruiz knows he has leverage. Its not like he lost the fight! He has 3 belts!

      Go to court because then aj has to waste a year waiting around no making money.

      Comment


      • #23
        DAMN, not everything in the contract is correct? DAMN DAMN. Then why did that fat clown dosser sign it?

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by andocom View Post
          "Not everything is correct in the contract" is a really odd way to phrase it, the contract is correct, it might not be what you want it to be or what Hearn is claiming it is, but the contract is what is signed and agreed.

          That really sounds like "I don't like what is in the contract".

          Does anyone think if the contract didn't give Hearn location choice Ruiz wouldn't have come straight out and said it by now, leaving aside yes it would have been crazy for a promoter for not to include that initially.
          This interview was done in Spanish. Probably a bad translation

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Queen_Leia View Post
            Ruiz is hilarious...Why would any lead promoter of the first fight give up complete control of the rematch in the contract when they are offering you the voluntary fight to begin with?


            Ruiz just wants more money and the venue of his choosing...Hearn should just take him to court, win the case (because he will) and wreck his life.
            Would be easy but getting the fight going is easier.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              It could be he's been told the contract wasn't drawn up or worded properly. Seems unlikely though,. I'm sure Eddie's lawyers know how to draw up a contract.
              That's what he's saying. I think this is his interview on a Mexican channel and probably a bad translation

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Dontbeahater View Post
                Are you aj fanboys finished yet?
                It's called negotiating. It's what happens after aj getting tko and quitting.

                Ruiz knows he has leverage. Its not like he lost the fight! He has 3 belts!

                Go to court because then aj has to waste a year waiting around no making money.
                Not everyone commenting is a fan boy, some of us just like seeing boxing and respect people who honour their word.

                Also it doesn't take a genius to work out negotiation and leverage are most useful before you sign a legally binding contract. Not after.

                Are people really cheerleading boxers to not honour rematch clauses they signed, so we only get in house match ups and mandatories from now on, is that what you really want?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by chubuk7 View Post
                  The rematch is confirmed but the location of the fight is still pending. Patience is a Virtue.
                  It's not pending why a press conference was done confirming the event .

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Contractual disputes are rarely taken to court. It’s never gonna get that far and all Andy and his team are trying to do is probably squeeze more money out and maybe get the fight in US by playing a bit of hard ball. A court case is not helpful to either party and would end up probably benefiting other boxer in the division. If Andy is stripped(the belts can’t be held hostage through a legal dispute) those belts will be fought over by the likes of Tyson Fury and Dillian Whyte(If he can get through the whole did she didn’t she pop the test)

                    Andy doesn’t necessarily have to go to SA particularly if US is advising it’s citizen against travelling to that country Ruiz has a strong case to not travel. The likelihood is that Hearn will probably have to be flexible in some way to get the fight over the line in SA. Hearn can’t really dig his heels in as the legal battle will only hurt his golden goose.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      It's funny to see how many people on this thread would bend over for hearn and take up the a**. Lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP