Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz on Rematch: Not Everything is Correct in The Contract

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz on Rematch: Not Everything is Correct in The Contract

    IBF, IBO, WBA, WBO heavyweight champion Andy Ruiz is insisting that he's not going to travel over to Saudi Arabia to face Anthony Joshua in a rematch, which at the moment is scheduled for December 7.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Ruiz is hilarious...Why would any lead promoter of the first fight give up complete control of the rematch in the contract when they are offering you the voluntary fight to begin with?


    Ruiz just wants more money and the venue of his choosing...Hearn should just take him to court, win the case (because he will) and wreck his life.

    Comment


    • #3
      As long as the signature is correct.....

      Comment


      • #4
        There is a reason why Team Whyte didn’t sign that same contract. Before anyone ask “Have you seen the contract” no we haven’t. But we have been in the sport long enough to know what are Standard clauses in them. Unless Team Joshua dropped the ball with this contract then, this should be an open and shut case (Just like the Lewis/Rahman one.)

        Comment


        • #5
          All Ruiz has to do is show the contract stating he calls the shots on where the rematch happens. What's keeping him from doing that ?!?!?

          He's being reactive, not proactive.

          Comment


          • #6
            LMAO!!! fat ass andy is letting al gaymon gas his head up. the alphabet orgs will soon strip him and he'll lose out on the aj payday! dummy!

            Comment


            • #7
              Ruiz must have seen the contract isn't correct before signing it but he never thought he could win like Dillian Whyte tho.

              Comment


              • #8
                "Not everything is correct in the contract" is a really odd way to phrase it, the contract is correct, it might not be what you want it to be or what Hearn is claiming it is, but the contract is what is signed and agreed.

                That really sounds like "I don't like what is in the contract".

                Does anyone think if the contract didn't give Hearn location choice Ruiz wouldn't have come straight out and said it by now, leaving aside yes it would have been crazy for a promoter for not to include that initially.

                Comment


                • #9
                  That ''I don't like what I'm signing but here goes'' defense

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I thought he said he didn't sign anything?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP