Maybe, I doubt it though. How easy would it be to say, Joshua does not have choice of location, very easy right.
So what could Ruiz mean which would be relevant, the contract wasn't drawn up correctly, so it's void, as in the whole contract was void including the first fight? Doubtful.
It sounds a lot more like "The contract isn't what I'd like it to be", if so, that's a problem because you signed it already.
Again, be super easy for Ruiz or team to clarify Joshua doesn't have choice of location, they haven't, where as everyone else has said Joshua has. The IBF sanctioned the fight in SA, doubt they would do that without knowing it was sound contractual.
So what could Ruiz mean which would be relevant, the contract wasn't drawn up correctly, so it's void, as in the whole contract was void including the first fight? Doubtful.
It sounds a lot more like "The contract isn't what I'd like it to be", if so, that's a problem because you signed it already.
Again, be super easy for Ruiz or team to clarify Joshua doesn't have choice of location, they haven't, where as everyone else has said Joshua has. The IBF sanctioned the fight in SA, doubt they would do that without knowing it was sound contractual.
Comment