Andy Ruiz - my team is trying to weasel out of the rematch
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Andy Ruiz on Rematch: Not Everything is Correct in The Contract
Collapse
-
-
Rotton chop
Your becoming a grub andy(part time) champion ruiz, you might be a smartie pants for the time being but you will lose at least 2 of your titles before this ends an be having to answer court dates, then you give yourself a bad name and now promoters will be hesitant to deal with Al Haymon character because hes snake oil merchant... you are a gutless wonder Mr Andy ruiz and a ungrateful sod an all the media and internet is on to you now, you will be trolled buddy and you will regret this, eddie hearn will no be stood over and will make astand against you, he must save face and not back down, your a chump andy pandy
Comment
-
Are the PBC fans going to come in here and ask boxingscene and the writer if they've seen the contract? The article says Joshua chooses location and date.
Comment
-
This ****ing idiot will end with **** all if he ain't careful ... how long do you thing Barry Hearn has been in boxung ? Do you really think Hearn would give at the time an average fighter a golden chance and not cover himself and his client completely in terms of a water tight contract if something were to go wrong ? Ruiz best wake up or end up skint in court .. my guess is he's just playing the game to get a extra few dollars or afew more flights and hotel rooms or whatever ... dangerous game if he digs in thou ..
Comment
-
-
-
If "not everything is correct in the contract" then why da *** did he sign it? And not just that. That contract is the result of negotiations in which his super-duper "advisor" was also involved.
If I was Hearn I would sue this little fat ***er.
Comment
-
Originally posted by makaveli1875 View PostHe's not weaseling out, he's using the leverage he has to make the fight on his terms. The leverage being the belts he took of the paper champion with his lucky punch from the gods
Team Ruiz are acting up on the contract they’ve already signed
Classic weaseling
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by andocom View Post"Not everything is correct in the contract" is a really odd way to phrase it, the contract is correct, it might not be what you want it to be or what Hearn is claiming it is, but the contract is what is signed and agreed.
That really sounds like "I don't like what is in the contract".
Does anyone think if the contract didn't give Hearn location choice Ruiz wouldn't have come straight out and said it by now, leaving aside yes it would have been crazy for a promoter for not to include that initially.
Comment
Comment