Lets settle it. Which win was more impressive?Floyd vs Canelo or Pacquiao vs Thurman?

[champion4ever]

I say Floyd vs Canelo because no one has ever come close in defeating Canelo Alvarez since. In addition, he has leaped several weight classes since that time and has won many more titles during that process too and yet remains undefeated. He is not the top draw in boxing for nothing.

[HitmanTommy]

I say Floyd vs Canelo because no one has ever come close in defeating Canelo Alvarez since. In addition, he has leaped several weight classes since that time and has won many more titles during that process too and yet remains undefeated. He is not the top draw in boxing for nothing.

That is a good point.

[Boxing Goat]

Wins don't grow. Floyd beat weakest version of Nelo fullstop. THeres no growth from that.
Pac took a bigger, fresher, young undefeated lions scalp, with 71 fights and 23 year career behind him whilst a senate, whilst being a former flyweight.

Nobody is going to defeat Thurman under those circumstances ever again. So nobodies win will be better than Pacs over thurmans.

The thing is that Canelo obviously did get better but you can't deny that as his resume grows, the way Floyd took him apart almost effortlessly seems be more surprising after each Canelo win. Even if he got probably 3 gifts and is most likely a ped cheat.

[Boxing Goat]

I say Floyd vs Canelo because no one has ever come close in defeating Canelo Alvarez since. In addition, he has leaped several weight classes since that time and has won many more titles during that process too and yet remains undefeated. He is not the top draw in boxing for nothing.

Huh lol? Are you for real? GGG ring a bell?

[Boxing Goat]

That is a good point.

Idiots stick together when their agendas cross I guess

[Articulateboxin]

I probably spent too long thinking about this, however let's try putting it another way. Would 23 year old Canelo have beaten the Thurman that fought Pac?

[Curtis Harper]

Had Thurman not been inactive

Pac wouldn't have fought him
And if he did fight an active Thurman, the outcome may have been different.

[FredRekk]

Had Thurman not been inactive

Pac wouldn't have fought him
And if he did fight an active Thurman, the outcome may have been different.

He was active, he just fought right before him.


So your words are completely false. Why don’t you go watch the fight yourself before making false claims.


And what MORON said Canelo hasn’t come close to losing since Mayweather?

Lmao you posters really have no life and no boxing intelligence. This guy probably started watching after Fielding, lol.

Canelo arguably lost to:
GGG 1
Erislandy Lara
Miguel Cotto was a terribly close fight, which shows that even at that point Canelo was still not in his full prime. Cotto was already over the hill and Canelo couldn’t lay him down.

PAC TKO’d dat n!66@ in his prime! Mayweather didn’t fight Cotto until 3 years later!

Current Thurman WHOOPS green Nelo!

[Curtis Harper]

He was active, he just fought right before him.

1 fight (subpar) in how long ???

[FredRekk]

1 fight (subpar) in how long ???

So you admit that he was active by acknowledging his fight prior to Manny in which Thurman won against Josesito.
Glad to know you finally acknowledge some truth and stop with your excuses, lies, false narratives, etc.
You’re a growing and maturing young boy!