Floyd wins is better pac win over Thurman has a * he was coming off a 2 year layoff plus his comeback fight Thurman look like crap
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lets settle it. Which win was more impressive?Floyd vs Canelo or Pacquiao vs Thurman?
Collapse
-
pac... but the fact that pac got smashed by jmm, and re entered the ring.. to me.. that is lengendary pelotas..
canelo never been ktfo.. never slept for minutes. so we do not know if he has it in him.
we know pac has it in him.
why are so many pinoy *******s always making ****** threads like this..
/
Comment
-
Pacquiao over Thurman and it’s not even close.
Mayweather had literally every advantage on top of the fact Canelo was way still too green.
Even Mosley was interviewed before the fight and said the same thing, Canelo still wet behind the ears.
Pacquiao had every DISADVANTAGE on top of the fact he’s 10 years Thurman’s senior! And he still pulled off a completely dominant victory, outclassed the undefeated PRIME THURMAN, and even scored a knockdown!
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostIt seems too many of you are voting based on how you feel about Floyd. The vote should be based on who was the better opponent.
We saw where Thurman was the fight before manny. We saw not only where Canelo was the fight before Floyd but also the next couple after.
Put it this way-Canelo would beat Manny. Thurman wouldn’t beat Floyd.
Prime Nelo would beat Manny yes, because he’s 40 lbs. heavier.
But the Canelo that fought Floyd?
GTFOH with your trash.
2013 Manny UD’s or TKO’s that Canelo easy work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostWhat pack of lies is this. I posted wwe don’t know if manny beats cotto at 147 because he didn’t fight him at 147 he fought him at 145.
Pac s win over thurman at 41 is historically is better than anything on flouds resume. Beating undefeated prime ww who had all physical advantages and something not done in history is all history will see.
Pac s win over thurman is better and it's not even arguab le. But we know floyd fans argue everything. You might as well say Bobby watts win over Hag Le r is better than srl win over hagler? Might as well say Torecampo win over pac is better than morales win over pac?
Is it so hard to see Floyd beat a nel o nowhere near prime or his best or so inexperienced at highest level? Be at nel o now. Yes, at 50 years old beat nel o at 160lbs. Stop this tit for tat. Blow ou r minds Floyd stop being charity case begging borrowing and stealing credit anyway you can as your resume don't speak for itself. Do something that will leave our jaws on floorLast edited by hugh grant; 10-16-2019, 03:38 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by moltres. View Posti meant wouldnt i put it wrong. i meant if canelo was so drained he would not of weighed 165, it would have been lower like when de la hoya was drained vs pac.Last edited by Citizen Koba; 10-16-2019, 03:53 AM.
Comment
-
Overall pluses and minuses on both sides... it's one of those where people are just gonna find ways to justify the answer they want.
Pacquiao:
Thurman was closer to prime and had achieved more
Pacquiao was (much) older
Canelo was green
Canelo was drained
Mayweather:
Much more dominant victory
Canelo was much bigger
Canelo is/was better than Thurman
Keith ain't even Keith any more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostOverall pluses and minuses on both sides... it's one of those where people are just gonna find ways to justify the answer they want.
Pacquiao:
Thurman was closer to prime and had achieved more
Pacquiao was (much) older
Canelo was green
Canelo was drained
Mayweather:
Much more dominant victory
Canelo was much bigger
Canelo is/was better than Thurman
Keith ain't even Keith any more.
But Pac s 5 years older than Floyd when he beat neloand it was a cw. Pac didn't drain thurman and try get advantage.
Why are people even arguing this.? Don't take what Floyd fans say seriously. Of course they will say floyds wins better. But they say things like there is nothing Pac can do that can elevate Pac above floyd!. So you know where you stand with Floyd fans. Nothing they say is born from realism so why would them pretending to think flouds win is better is concluded from fair evaluation? They think flouds win over Hatton is better than Pac s 2 round dextruction at Hatton best weight. So we already know if Pac koed thurman in 2 rounds floyds fans would still think foyds nelo cw green win is better still by some margin? They can always make a case for floyd win being better in their own minds. They think floyds cheated scales win over jmm is better than Pac s 3 wins if not scorecard error.
Nothing is born from realism..If Pac beat Anthony joshua, Floyd fans would say Floyd has win over so how good does that make clouds win over pac?
Wind up !merchants and sarcasm specialists are Floyd fansLast edited by hugh grant; 10-16-2019, 05:01 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostSo this applies to Floyd also doesn't it einstein.? Floyd s win over nel o has huge asterix.
Pac s win over thurman at 41 is historically is better than anything on flouds resume. Beating undefeated prime ww who had all physical advantages and something not done in history is all history will see.
Pac s win over thurman is better and it's not even arguab le. But we know floyd fans argue everything. You might as well say Bobby watts win over Hag Le r is better than srl win over hagler? Might as well say Torecampo win over pac is better than morales win over pac?
Is it so hard to see Floyd beat a nel o nowhere near prime or his best or so inexperienced at highest level? Be at nel o now. Yes, at 50 years old beat nel o at 160lbs. Stop this tit for tat. Blow ou r minds Floyd stop being charity case begging borrowing and stealing credit anyway you can as your resume don't speak for itself. Do something that will leave our jaws on floor
And undefeated with an assist from his "Security Beefcakes" over his baby Mama.
Tenshin!!! Nay, say no more!!!
Comment
Comment