Eddie Hearn: will sue WBC if Wilder-Fury 2 happens

[kafkod]

I'd like to see Fury take on Whyte before the Wilder rematch(s)

I can't envisage any outcome to that one other than a wide UD win for Fury.

What I'd like to see is Wilder forced to fight Dillian before a Fury rematch, then we can find out what he's so scared of. Fury can mop up the winner afterwards.

[MDPopescu]

So, with the WBC is the mandatory every 18 months? Or what?

Yes....................................

[Motorcity Cobra]

Why do you guys like to twist the narratives? You can't just be honest and s hit on the organisation when they are wrong? Some of you guys lose a lot of crediblility when your stories are lace up with lies.

Wilder himself told whyte that he would make him wait for TWO years, he didn't just say that off the bat! He knew that he had the backing of the WBC.

They didn't just say to him fight a final eliminator and become the WBC mandatory.... If they did please you and others that like to twist that narratives please show us those quotes from the WBC.

Now you're twisting words. The 2 years comment was because his mandatory is called once a year. Breazeale and then Whyte. Did you know that or are u twisting his words?

[Boksfan]

Sue them Eddie, show that Mexican crooks who's the boss!

[MDPopescu]

I don't know if Hearn really has a point here, but...

... back on 12th February 2019, "Dillian Whyte has been ordered by the WBC to fight American heavyweight Dominic Breazeale.

The winner of this fight will be the mandatory to face the winner of the Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury rematch."

... there was no "rematch"... then???

[IHITBACK]

Sue them Eddie, show that Mexican crooks who's the boss!

LOL, A SHORT FAT MEXICAN SLAPPED HIM AROUND THE RING AND TOOK THOSE TITLES

Wilder would've knocked his head off his shoulders, now we know WHY he was running from the fight

[Motorcity Cobra]

I don't know if Hearn really has a point here, but...

... back on 12th February 2019, "Dillian Whyte has been ordered by the WBC to fight American heavyweight Dominic Breazeale.

The winner of this fight will be the mandatory to face the winner of the Deontay Wilder and Tyson Fury rematch."

... there was no "rematch"... then???

Whyte said no to the eliminator. Fury pulled out of the rematch. Breazeale was ordered.

And Hearn didn't say he'd stop the rematch from happening. He said the trilogy. Meaning if they tried to fight again after their rematch. If Whyte beats Rivas by the time Fury/Wilder 3 would happen it would be time for the Whyte mandatory to be ordered. Whyte is losing to Rivas anyway.

But why didn't he sue after Haney got stiffed by the WBC?

[MDPopescu]

Whyte said no to the eliminator. Fury pulled out of the rematch. Breazeale was ordered.

And Hearn didn't say he'd stop the rematch from happening. He said the trilogy. Meaning if they tried to fight again after their rematch. If Whyte beats Rivas by the time Fury/Wilder 3 would happen it would be time for the Whyte mandatory to be ordered. Whyte is losing to Rivas anyway.

But why didn't he sue after Haney got stiffed by the WBC?

... I'm not a "Hearn's defender" here...

[champion4ever]

Well at this point, Hearn has no choice to because Dillian Whyte is his insurance policy; In the event that Anthony Joshua loses his rematch to Andy Ruiz, Jr. He has to have at least one heavyweight title belt in his stable

[Motorcity Cobra]

... I'm not a "Hearn's defender" here...

I know you're not. But im trying to tell people he said the trilogy not the second fight but nobody is listening