Eddie Hearn: will sue WBC if Wilder-Fury 2 happens

[Ray*]

They call his mandatory once a year. Whyte would've been behind Breazeale. That's why he said 2 years. He didn't pull the 2 years statement out of his ass. But stick to your conspiracy theories

Wrong. He knows he has the backing of the WBC. Do you know what he made that statement to Whyte? No you don’t. But here you are defending and twisting things again... Why am I not surprised!!!

[Chrismart]

The WBC have done Whyte dirty no doubt.
Wilder's team also seem to be able to pull WBC strings a little more than they should.

But, they've a got a what could be a tough fight in front of them in Rivas. Time for 100% focus.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Multiple youtube channels reporting that Eddie Hearn threatens to sue WBC (and Wilder) if they allow Wilder-Fury 2 to happen. Eddie wants the fight to be with Dillian Whyte.

Don't understand how that will work. Wilder just made a mandatory so he doesn't need to do it again for some time. Also, Fury was mandated ahead of Whyte by WBC for the rematch, so won't Wilder-Fury be mandatory anyway?

Whyte ain't getting any mandatory until he fights eliminators and won't get voluntary as long as he is with Eddie Hearn.

Hearn will sue and lose...

He’s absolutely pathetic. Whyte literally turned down a WBC eliminator to become mandatory.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Wrong. He knows he has the backing of the WBC. Do you know what he made that statement to Whyte? No you don’t. But here you are defending and twisting things again... Why am I not surprised!!!

So you think it's just a coincidence that Wilder said 2 years and that's the exact time his fight with Whyte wouldve been mandated. Just one big coincidence?

[PotentialToast]

Yes....................................

According to their rules, every 12 months. The reluctance of the WBC to keep to / enforce their rules has been to the deteriment of Whyte which is why they will have legal issues with Whyte.