Eddie Hearn: will sue WBC if Wilder-Fury 2 happens

[Eff Pandas]

Yea idk wtf Eddie is supposed to be suing for exactly. Whyte is fighting a mando fight vs Rivas next. He's not even the mando yet. He could lose to Rivas first off. But if he wins as expected he'll be mando then, but only then. Thing is Wilder just fought a mando a month ago so the standard is that a champion usually just needs to fight one mando in 12 months (I know one ABC group gots some 2 mando back to back situations for newly vacant title winner guys, but that wouldn't be relevant here).

So idk how Eddie thinks Whyte is getting effed. And shouldn't Whyte be the one suing the WBC anyway? Why is Eddie who's supposedly not Whyte's promoter suing on his behalf???

[PeasantCrusha]

Yea idk wtf Eddie is supposed to be suing for exactly. Whyte is fighting a mando fight vs Rivas next. He's not even the mando yet. He could lose to Rivas first off. But if he wins as expected he'll be mando then, but only then. Thing is Wilder just fought a mando a month ago so the standard is that a champion usually just needs to fight one mando in 12 months (I know one ABC group gots some 2 mando back to back situations for newly vacant title winner guys, but that wouldn't be relevant here).

So idk how Eddie thinks Whyte is getting effed. And shouldn't Whyte be the one suing the WBC anyway? Why is Eddie who's supposedly not Whyte's promoter suing on his behalf???

Damn, Hearn must not like Joshua too much. He is seriously trying to get him killed in the ring.


Wilder by 2 round KO. Fck outta here with that fake ass Frank Bruno act.

[Bmore18]

Yea idk wtf Eddie is supposed to be suing for exactly. Whyte is fighting a mando fight vs Rivas next. He's not even the mando yet. He could lose to Rivas first off. But if he wins as expected he'll be mando then, but only then. Thing is Wilder just fought a mando a month ago so the standard is that a champion usually just needs to fight one mando in 12 months (I know one ABC group gots some 2 mando back to back situations for newly vacant title winner guys, but that wouldn't be relevant here).

So idk how Eddie thinks Whyte is getting effed. And shouldn't Whyte be the one suing the WBC anyway? Why is Eddie who's supposedly not Whyte's promoter suing on his behalf???

This is why Hearn has no chance of winning any lawsuit. Its the WBC's own rules like it or not. I wanna see Whyte-Wilder but not as much as the Fury rematch. Lets also not act like Whyte didnt just duck a shot at 3 belts on April 13

[Eff Pandas]

This is why Hearn has no chance of winning any lawsuit. Its the WBC's own rules like it or not. I wanna see Whyte-Wilder but not as much as the Fury rematch. Lets also not act like Whyte didnt just duck a shot at 3 belts on April 13

Oh yea no doubt Whyte has done himself no favors by turning down more mando spot fights than maybe anyone in recent history probably.

[paulf]

WBC has done Haymon a big favor by putting off making Whyte the mandatory, but they have a history of making life easy for money-making beltholders.

WBC know that if they order Wilder-Whyte, Hearn will likely try to force it to DAZN and take it to pure bid if he needs to. If he wins it, Wilder fights Whyte in DAZN.

Haymon has been in that position before when Roc Nation won the Quillin Korobov big and Haymon has Quillin vacate rather that fight for the competition.

Haymon doesn’t want that to happen again and the WBC are looking out for him.

[Ray*]

Now you're twisting words. The 2 years comment was because his mandatory is called once a year. Breazeale and then Whyte. Did you know that or are u twisting his words?

Now you twisting Wilders words.

[Toffee]

The WBC announced on Tuesday that its board of governors has voted unanimously for Breazeale and Whyte to fight for the organization's interim title.

If their camps do not make a deal the WBC said there will be a purse bid at its headquarters in Mexico City on March 12 to determine the promotional rights and fighter purses. If the fight goes to a purse bid each fighter would receive 50 percent of the winning bid.

https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/25981315/dominic-breazeale-dillian-whyte-interim-world-title-bout-ordered?platform=amp

He said NOPE. Just like he did against Pulev & Ortiz.

That just shows they ordered it. But then they ordered a different fight - Whyte never pulled out of the fight. You know this.

Not that they're relevant but I'll give you the Pulev and Ortiz statement.
Pulev was IBF. Ortiz fight was to become "2nd Mandatory". So different.

If Whyte had pulled out of the Breazeale fight then this whole situation wouldn't exist.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Now you twisting Wilders words.

Actually I know what I'm talking about. He said he won't have to fight him for 2 years because of the way the mandatory are set up. Not some grand conspiracy theory between Wilder & the WBC

[Ray*]

Actually I know what I'm talking about. He said he won't have to fight him for 2 years because of the way the mandatory are set up. Not some grand conspiracy theory between Wilder & the WBC

Yeah you are Wilder, “You know what you are talking about” so tell us how the WBC mandatory is “Set up”. Since you know what you are talking about. Lol

[Motorcity Cobra]

Yeah you are Wilder, “You know what you are talking about” so tell us how the WBC mandatory is “Set up”. Since you know what you are talking about. Lol

They call his mandatory once a year. Whyte would've been behind Breazeale. That's why he said 2 years. He didn't pull the 2 years statement out of his ass. But stick to your conspiracy theories