Originally posted by koolkc107
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Jacobs Faces $1M Penalty, 3 Pounds Overweight At 2nd Weigh-In
Collapse
-
Comments Thread For: Jacobs Faces $1M Penalty, 3 Pounds Overweight At 2nd Weigh-In
LAS VEGAS Eddie Hearn wasn't kidding. Daniel Jacobs' promoter suggested Wednesday that Jacobs could ignore the 170-pound limit for his second-day weigh-in the morning of his fight against Canelo Alvarez. The steep penalty $250,000 per pound over 170 was thought to be prohibitive, but Hearn clarified that weighing over 170 pounds Saturday morning wouldn't cost Jacobs his IBF middleweight or prevent the fight from happening.
[Click Here To Read More]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by OCPancho View PostAnd Floyd did not make him sign a rehydration clause .
What was his fight night weight ?
You think draining is an advantage ? LOL
Canelo also fought at 147 when he was definitely a 154 pounder .
Canelo is also the king of catchweight title fights .
He has had more catchweight title fights than anyone ever .
Making Jacobs sign a rehydration clause is a pu$$Y move.
Specially that Canelo and Oscar are already talking about going up to 169 AND AND 175.
But, I don't expect you to see the light .
Hahahaha.
Canelo never paid 1 million to have more weight than his rival
Thats a disgusting movement
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Curtis Harper View PostA poster mentioned how GBP anticipated DJ blowing the scales. They could have made the penalty 1 mil per lb if they felt weight was an issue.
Trust me, if a promoter is out to get free money and have a good idea that money is assured, they would have made the penalty notable.
The better man will win and it won't be because of weight.
However, I agree that this fight isn't going to come down to weight but to will and skill. I think this is the right time for Jacobs because Canelo could still be emotionally drained from the Golovkin rematch; To the point where he takes his foot off the accelerator and loses focus due to being overconfident.
Comment
Comment