This is a fun little topic. Obviously skill is more important than size, but that is only to a certain extent: I would favor most any heavyweight to pick apart Lomachenko (or whomever you think is the top Lt weight) despite the skill difference. So I use that absurdity to show that size does matter.
Now, there is very little a fighter can do to alter his size (reach is reach, height is height, etc), so to what extent would adding weight make him better? Especially against modern heavies who will be outweighing him as is.
Now, there is very little a fighter can do to alter his size (reach is reach, height is height, etc), so to what extent would adding weight make him better? Especially against modern heavies who will be outweighing him as is.
Comment