those bad score cards can't just be brushed off cuz you feel the right guy got the decision.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nobody has ever been robbed against Canelo.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by dannnnn View PostGolovkin got robbed blind in the first fight. If either of those fights could have been called a draw it was the second one. Out of two fights and six judges, one judge's scorecard was for Golovkin. That's corruption, plain and simple.
One judge also had the Mayweather fight a draw ffs.
For what it's worth, I thought Canelo beat Trout convincingly enough and I thought he just edged Lara mainly on account of Lara not letting his hands go enough. I don't have a problem with the decision itself in those fights, only with the fact that in each of those two bouts one judge scored it far too widely in favour of Canelo, which almost guarantees he gets the benefit of the doubt in a close fight.
There's no doubt that Canelo recieves favourable judging and just about everyone (who isn't blinded by bias) acknowledges it.
Comment
-
-
Agree with the OP, mostly it's the fan boys who scream corruption! when the decision goes against their man. It's quite pathetic, some people obviously have no life of their own and instead transfer their self to a boxer. So when he gets beaten it's like they got beaten, so unfair, the world is against me, boo hoo.
Comment
-
I personally thought the scores in the Cotto fight were bad too. 119-109, 118-110, and the other judge had it 117-111. The third score isn't totally terrible but I seriously feel that Cotto won more than 1-2 rounds. If I remember correctly, I had it 115-113.
Comment
Comment