Did Kovalev take bigger risks than Golovkin? Who has the better resume?

[dan_cov]

Kovalev though his resume just continues to look worse and worse.
Of course some will argue he ruined those fighters but lets be fair they were simply noway near as good as people first thought (Cleverly, Sillakh to a degree, Agnew) or they were there for the taking (B-Hop and Pascal).

I think Kovalev achieved more and has the deeper resume but GGG might just have the better win in Jacobs.

[Thuglife Nelo]

What has golovkin got do with with kovalev in any way?what is the link? that they are both white? thats a rhetorical question btw...but im guessing you probobly dont know what that means either

Yes people debate Spence & Buds resumes because they are in the same division and will fight within the next year or two you complete and utter moron.

Can you comment on my new thread comparing Sherman Williams and Julian Williams, both are black and both have the same surname, now thats already x2 a better thread than this one

Ok, let me be more objective for two fighters I rock with, Loma and Usyk. So for discussion sake on a boxing forum, regarding Draw power and the best for these two stars, who has the better resume, Loma or Usyk?

For me, I have to ride without Usyk. With Abel saying that Kovalev would be easy for Golovkin, and obviously Abel acknowledging that GGG would eventually fight at 175, the thread title states, who took more risks, better resume... why would anyone bring up race baiting as you did?

[Chrismart]

I think Golovkin is the better fighter, and has a slightly better resume.

Both guys can box, I really enjoyed the mid range stuff in the Canelo rematch from both guys and Kovalev outboxed Ward for stretches in their first fight.
Both quality fighters.