Originally posted by j.razor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBC Grants Canelo Voluntary Defense, Then Charlo-Golovkin Winner
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sicko View PostYeah, me asking for it will get it done for sure
I wish it was that simple
JERMALL VS GOLOVKIN!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Bobby Shaw View PostNo one can deny Jacobs was robbed just like anyone with eyes would know GGG was robbed 2 times against Canelo. That's boxing, full of robberies. Jacobs was robbed so GGG could face Canelo as it was deemed to be a bigger money fight. Canelo won't win a round against Jacobs and will be very lucky to see the 10th round. We know he can't deal with mobility.
Jermall vs golovkin!
Comment
-
Originally posted by j.razor View PostYou must of missed the last 11 rounds....LMMFAO!
Jermall vs golovkin!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steven Mccowan View PostOh we done got this down. We aint gonna go back and forth having the same discussion this time, like we did when you were saying for months that rigo was gonna ruin and embarass Loma are we? Theres really no need. You know i know GGG gonna win. So lets just wait til they fight. VADA tests are gonna be involved is all i know. Thats all im sayin. So if fight dont happen im sure thatll factor in. Charlo wants none of GGG im sure. Over and out.
Jermall vs golovkin!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg
Comment
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostEasy fight for GGG. Charlo's been protected for too long and is just a basic banger so he'll play into Golovkin's hands. Golovkin is on the downside but this level of opponent should still be easy for him. Charlo's just not that good.
Can't hate on him for wanting another Canelo payday but it's not a fight I'm personally interested in though I'd probably watch it but with even less interest than last month and my interest last month was very minimal.
Jermall vs golovkin!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg
Comment
Comment