honest question for AJ fans

[Sid-Knee]

Which is why he agreed to go to the UK for a low ball flat fee.




That is false. He agreed to go to the UK for a low ball flat fee with no rematch if he lost.




Because Hearn lied about the fight being next, Wilder is done being treated like ****. If Hearn wants to keep stalling, it's going to cost him. So Wilder is back to publicly requesting 50/50 (just like Parker did), even though he'd obviously take 60/40. You always start higher and in Wilder's mind, negotiations are starting over from scratch after Hearn refused to keep his word about the fight being next even after Wilder agreed to everything.

Wilder has always demanded he gets a rematch clause if he loses. He hasn't moved from that position. So stop lying all the time will you.

[Sid-Knee]

Do you or do you not believe Cotto only made 700k for his retirement fight?

That was Cotto's guarantee, obviously he was going to take a big cut of the PPV. Just like most PPPV fighters. They have a guarantee, then they get a big cut once the money is in.

[N/A]

There isn't a big boxing scene in those countries, that's why they fight elsewhere. Again, pretty simple really.

There isn't a big boxing seen in Mexico or the UK? Lewis had to fight in the US because the UK doesn't have a big boxing scene? Naseem Hamed's biggest fights were in the US because the UK doesn't have a big boxing scene?

[Phenom]

Wilder has always demanded he gets a rematch clause if he loses. He hasn't moved from that position. So stop lying all the time will you.

"An offer went out from Deontay and his entire team, to Hearn and Joshua. The fight would take place at the end of the year, no rematch clause... And we're taking all of the risk.... $50 million against 50%"

https://www.boxingscene.com/team-wilder-send-50-million-offer-joshua-unification--127535

[N/A]

Wilder has always demanded he gets a rematch clause if he loses. He hasn't moved from that position. So stop lying all the time will you.

Sidney, even Hearn has repeatedly stated publicly that Wilder agreed to no rematch if he lost.

You gotta get your story straight brotha.

[N/A]

That was Cotto's guarantee, obviously he was going to take a big cut of the PPV. Just like most PPPV fighters. They have a guarantee, then they get a big cut once the money is in.

It wasn't a pay-per-view.

Next excuse?

[Sid-Knee]

There isn't a big boxing seen in Mexico or the UK? Lewis had to fight in the US because the UK doesn't have a big boxing scene? Naseem Hamed's biggest fights were in the US because the UK doesn't have a big boxing scene?

Naz had a deal with HBO to fight in the states every other fight. That's why Naz fought in the states, not because there wasn't any money in the UK.

If the money was in the UK, do you think a single American would have travelled to fight Lewis? It's common knowledge Americans hate to travel. And Lewis did have some big fights at home with Bruno, Botha, McCall and Ruddock.

[Sid-Knee]

"An offer went out from Deontay and his entire team, to Hearn and Joshua. The fight would take place at the end of the year, no rematch clause... And we're taking all of the risk.... $50 million against 50%"


https://www.boxingscene.com/team-wil...cation--127535

Haha, That was the offer from Wilder to AJ. Not from AJ to Wilder. The deal Wilder wants to fight AJ has a rematch clause in it even if he loses. Or are you dis*****g this?

[Sid-Knee]

Sidney, even Hearn has repeatedly stated publicly that Wilder agreed to no rematch if he lost.

You gotta get your story straight brotha.

Are you saying Wilder doesn't want a rematch clause even if he loses? You know Wilder wants one fighting in the UK.

[Sid-Knee]

It wasn't a pay-per-view.

Next excuse?

Then from ticket sales and international rights.

You like to claim Cotto got more money, but can you tell me how much he did earn considering you make out you kind of do?