Did i watch a different fight to everyone else? How on earth was that a great performance? Ortiz was 39 at the very youngest (mansour says he's 49), no world level wins (but he beat jennings doe), no-one knows if he's actually any good, and looked far from impressive in last couple of performances. Yet he outboxed the young champ for most the fight. And people are saying wilder proved he can take a shot? Excuse me? He brought the Harlem shake back into 2018 when Ortiz smacked him on the chin and it took a LONG time for him to recover with the ref employing the classic 'let's suddenly make sure the corners clean' act to buy him some more time. Yet people slaughter Joshua for beating a more proven/younger fighter and barely getting hit. But he don't want that work though!!!!! Funny how the boxing 'sweet scientists' don't give Joshua any credit for boxing and moving but they are suddenly infatuated with the crude puncher. Winning a decision means you were exposed now apparently, you have to lose most the rounds and land a hail Mary punch to impress on this forum. Keep up the agendas guys, been doing some fine work on this site recently.
Wilders performance against Ortiz was not impressive....
Collapse
-
-
Hilarious when Whyte batters Ortiz for 3 rounds and KOs him because he's a 50 year old man.
Wonder what the excuses are then? -
Comment
-
'He was never the same'. But then they don't apply that logic to Ortiz beating jennings after wlad 'he beat him in better fashion than klitschko' the guys are a bunch of clowns, sick to death of them. Not even a minority anymore.Comment
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment