Originally posted by j.razor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: We Have Never Seen Anything Like Lomachenko
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostTyson was sparring Carl "The Truth" Williams when he was 18. He beat James "Quick" Tillis on May 3rd, and beat Mitch Green on May 20th in the same year. In fact he fought 13 times in 1986, finishing with a win over Trevor Berbick, winning the HW Championship @ age 20! Yeah, but I guess everybody does that!
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostWell technically, he didn’t win THEE heavyweight championship until he beat Spinks, who we all know was a light heavyweight fortunate enough to catch an old Larry Holmes. Most heavyweights are rated based on how they did against the best of their time. And in Mike’s time, Lewis, Holyfield, and Bowe were the best guys. He never fought Bowe. And not only did he lose to Lewis and Holyfield. He wasn’t competitive against either guy. It’s kinda hard for me to call a guy great when in three fights against guys that were great, I stuggle to find rounds he won.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Free0001 View PostStylistically, Loma's style is very similar to Orlando Canizales'.
If you are unfamiliar with Orlando Canizales, check out his footage on YouTube.
https://********/3ogsB0zxKDI
the things you read in this site
Comment
-
Originally posted by T.M.T View PostGreat amateur career but as a pro he's a very good show opener. That version of Loma gets knocked out by Tank Davis and Mikey Garcia.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostWell technically, he didn’t win THEE heavyweight championship until he beat Spinks, who we all know was a light heavyweight fortunate enough to catch an old Larry Holmes. Most heavyweights are rated based on how they did against the best of their time. And in Mike’s time, Lewis, Holyfield, and Bowe were the best guys. He never fought Bowe. And not only did he lose to Lewis and Holyfield. He wasn’t competitive against either guy. It’s kinda hard for me to call a guy great when in three fights against guys that were great, I stuggle to find rounds he won.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redgloveman View PostGood post, and I agree with the Pacquiao rather than Mayweather comparison.
I don't agree that Lomachenko is nowhere near as skilled as Floyd though. It's just that their skills are completely different skills so it slightly defies comparison.
Floyd had an incredible innate sense of distance and positioning. The way he would shut down his opponent's offence was just amazing to watch. His sense of where he could hit and not get hit is probably the best I've ever seen. Loma cannot do that, he just doesn't have the ability to do it (as far as we have seen)
Loma's much more like Pacquiao in that he gets his edge over his opponents by being extremely skilled and very athletic. They both look at their opponent and say "whatever you're bringing, I'll do it faster and at a higher level than you and I'll go to a place you can't match".
On the other hand Mayweather would be saying to his opponent "everything you've done before to get you to this point as a fighter won't work against me, because my knowledge of the game is so intensely high that I can distort the programming that you have trained into yourself as a fighter. I can stand in such a way that you think you can hit me when in actual fact you can't. I can also stand in such a way that you KNOW that you cannot launch an attack at me without being countered" (this last one was how he would completely shut down fighters' offence). It really was beautiful to watch, the pressure on Floyd's opponents at every moment in a fight was intense. This is a discussion for another time but I don't think Floyd would have matched up with Hearns well at all - Hearns's length would have given him fits imo.
Loma's not in the same zip-code as Floyd when it comes to that low-pace, potshotting, aggressive defence style; but it's not fair to equate that to a lack of "skills". The way that Loma could move around the pocket so fluidly and create angles to attack his opponent is actually better than Floyd in my opinion, even if he can't do that magician **** we saw Floyd do.
Enjoy both fighters on their own merits would be my advice.
Floyd moved better than anyone at 130-135.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostI brought up Mike as an example of a young guy (HW Champ @ 22), that just ripped through his competiton, compared to a guy who didn't have his 1st pro fight until 25! Berbick, Bonecrusher, Thomas, Tucker, Biggs, Holmes, Tubbs, Spinks, Bruno, and Williams, all before his 25th birthday! That list is better than Wilder and Joshua's!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Steven Mccowan View PostHa. These kids on here dont get that. They here a persons breakdown on a fighter and just go with it and never learn. Good lesson there fella, nice to see
Comment
Comment