Comments Thread For: Golovkin, Hopkins, Monzon: The Record at Middleweight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lester Tutor
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 17673
    • 365
    • 253
    • 22,224

    #11
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    '

    could be wrong..... but, I think Golovkin is on 9 ?
    Golovkin still on cloud 9 with an AC outter for Christmas lights

    Comment

    • DreamFighter
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2012
      • 4221
      • 119
      • 43
      • 54,494

      #12
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
      '

      could be wrong..... but, I think Golovkin is on 9 ?
      you may be right, thank you - depends on whether he fought Geale for the vacant title OR was handed it before the fight.

      take your pick, gifted title or vacant.

      Comment

      • Progrssive_Jedi
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2015
        • 3360
        • 140
        • 37
        • 10,393

        #13
        GGG is on 20

        It’s silly to say Geale was the Super, he was running from GGG. Only to come back later. No one but GGG haters at the time thought Geale was the better true Champ. To me that **** matters, because Bixing is a game of keep always.

        Comment

        • Leonis
          Contender
          • Aug 2017
          • 201
          • 15
          • 0
          • 6,790

          #14
          To make it even more complicated Golovkin on saturday will be defending the exact same belt that Monzon and Hopkins won which is the original WBA World Middleweight Champion belt. The WBA Super belt is the newest that didnt exist back then. If Golovkins WBA belt is not legitimate you can argue that Monzons and Hopkins belt is not legitimate neither or you can say that Golovkins WBA Super belt is superior to Monzons and Hopkins WBA and therefor even with less defenses hes achieved more by simply winning superior belts.

          Comment

          • DreamFighter
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2012
            • 4221
            • 119
            • 43
            • 54,494

            #15
            Originally posted by Leonis
            To make it even more complicated Golovkin on saturday will be defending the exact same belt that Monzon and Hopkins won which is the original WBA World Middleweight Champion belt. The WBA Super belt is the newest that didnt exist back then. If Golovkins WBA belt is not legitimate you can argue that Monzons and Hopkins belt is not legitimate neither or you can say that Golovkins WBA Super belt is superior to Monzons and Hopkins WBA and therefor even with less defenses hes achieved more by simply winning superior belts.
            the WBA belt has always been legit. THE belt,. not invented secondary WBA ones.

            Comment

            • DreamFighter
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 4221
              • 119
              • 43
              • 54,494

              #16
              Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi
              It’s silly to say Geale was the Super, he was running from GGG. Only to come back later. No one but GGG haters at the time thought Geale was the better true Champ. To me that **** matters, because Bixing is a game of keep always.
              prime Geale would be a handful for GGG, tough call.

              Comment

              • Lester Tutor
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 17673
                • 365
                • 253
                • 22,224

                #17
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                I am one of those.....

                and the reason why is because the following statement is wrong



                " something " is not good enough

                the IBO intercontinental champ is defending " something " lol
                Why is Cliff Rold scared to cite real facts? Is he afraid of Loeffler or Pugmire to retaliate? Sure its Gennady’s “WBA defense” but why do they casually include the regular WBA defenses when there were already Super Champs? It’s to say “Thurman was really the champ but so was Floyd?”

                Comment

                • Leonis
                  Contender
                  • Aug 2017
                  • 201
                  • 15
                  • 0
                  • 6,790

                  #18
                  Originally posted by DreamFighter
                  the WBA belt has always been legit. THE belt,. not invented secondary WBA ones.
                  The invented is the Super not the one Golovkin won.

                  Comment

                  • DreamFighter
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 4221
                    • 119
                    • 43
                    • 54,494

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Leonis
                    The invented is the Super not the one Golovkin won.
                    nono theres only one, golovkin didnt win it until geale.

                    theres only one world, thus one world title from any body. unless you live in 2, if you do let us know how you do.

                    Comment

                    • angkag
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 2611
                      • 167
                      • 41
                      • 38,955

                      #20
                      Kind of amused how all these Golovkin threads seem to trigger some people.

                      Bottom line, it seems the haters (of whoever) are the only ones who really give a toss about all these mythical comparisons of the alphabet variety.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP