Comments Thread For: Deontay Wilder Speaks Out on 'March For Our Lives' Movement

[PunchyPotorff]

My opinion doesn't matter, only the facts do?

Okay. Then could you please show me the statistics for crimes prevented because of guns? Murders, attempted robberies, assaults etc?

Last I checked the media doesn't report on those the same way they do with crimes committed with guns.

Be interesting to match the statistics to have an objective debate on the gun issue. If objectivity were the objective I'm sure the media could easily present both positive AND negative sides of gun ownership and let us sheep err citizens make a more informed decision.

And I like how you tried to frame me for being ignorant for not wanting assault weapons banned but then you spat out your true feelings in your next post - which is consistent with the whole slippery slope argument. You admitted to wanting all guns banned, not just assault rifles, but tried to use a sneaky and subversive argument while hiding your true intent.

He never said he wanted all guns banned. That's deflectorama b.s. you're just trying to twist a comment around for your gain. I call b.s.

[PunchyPotorff]

Took a bit, but finally Wilder and I agree on something. LOL

[mathed]

Fake news. Hundreds of blacks are killed in cities like DC, Chicago, Baltimore all the time..... no one says a thing.

The FBI and local cops knew ALL about this Cruz kid and did NOTHING. You want to blame someone, blame them.

[Mr. Philadel]

Not a fan of MARCHING!!..that ish is for fools but salute to Bomber though

It's levels to this and one day he'll overstand it

[mathed]

Now they’re saying you should be 21 to buy guns but at the same time I’m supposed to take some kids seriously on the gun debate? F that. I’m not going to let a generation that eats tide pods lecture me about the 2nd Ammendment.

No schit man, that’s the truth. I have a family and I’m not going to sit by and let anybody take away my right to protect them....:especially not some 17 year old kids who know absolutely nothing about the real world.

['b']

He never said he wanted all guns banned. That's deflectorama b.s. you're just trying to twist a comment around for your gain. I call b.s.

Failed reading comprehension? He said he'd gladly give up his .357 magnum if it meant less people dying, AFTER he said statistically guns are bad etc etc.

He said it in his own way, so I call b.s. on your ability to read and understand what someone is saying either directly or indirectly

['b']

Sorry just realised you are an anti-gun nutjob. Do you get paid to type in these forums because you are pretty damn committed.

You keep telling people that they have nothing to fear about their guns being taken away, but I already proved that many people who use that argument are lying to gain a foothold (give an inch, they take a mile).

That guy tried to single me out by asking if I was okay with assault rifles (I never said I was) to act as if he was the reasonable one that was just against certain kinds of guns.

In his next comment he said the 'statistics' show that "over 70%" of mass shootings are committed with illegally obtained firearms (note: NOT assault rifles), and "less than 15%" are committed using LEGALLY owned firearms. Correct me if I'm wrong, but more than 70% and less than 15% makes up less than 100%...and he said he'd "gladly" give up his .357 magnum (note: NOT an assault rifle) if it meant saving more lives.

So he tries to be the voice of reason saying he only wants assault rifles banned, but then reveals his true intent. Slippery slope rings true in this case

[jonnyc420]

That's it, keep saying what NRA orders you to say. No one is taking your guns, bozo. And by your logic, we should have NO laws, since someone will always break a law. Ridiculous.

Lol just mentioning the NRA shows you are nothing but an CNN loving clown. Now follow the rest of the sheep and do what the TV tells you to do.

['b']

Lol just mentioning the NRA shows you are nothing but an CNN loving clown. Now follow the rest of the sheep and do what the TV tells you to do.

Agreed.

People had guns and defended the right to have guns before the NRA, and other countries that have guns don't take orders from the NRA.

He is a political shill, nothing more. A weak man, both mentally and physically most likely.

[cali37]

Failed reading comprehension? He said he'd gladly give up his .357 magnum if it meant less people dying, AFTER he said statistically guns are bad etc etc.

He said it in his own way, so I call b.s. on your ability to read and understand what someone is saying either directly or indirectly

If you're so interested in my personal opinion, I would ban all weapons except for pistols and *******s with a set round size like in California.

I only mentioned I'd give up my weapon because you brought up that there are many people who would ban all weapons and my response to that was IF giving up my weapon meant saving lives, I'd do it. Wouldn't you?