41 years old Klitschko vs 38 years old Ortiz - who is a better fighter?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Redd Foxx
    Hittin' the heavy bag.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 22007
    • 1,180
    • 2,316
    • 1,257,197

    #101
    For the last 2 years I've felt Ortiz is the most talented in the division and I still feel that way. Wilder just has that Foremanesque power that can change things at any moment.
    Wlad v AJ was a good fight but Klitschko was a shell of himself by that point. I'd pick today's Ortiz to beat last year's Wlad.

    Comment

    • Sid-Knee
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 18249
      • 1,091
      • 731
      • 155,532

      #102
      Originally posted by lefthook2daliva
      BLAHBLAHBLAHBLAH...All of that and you're unwilling to declare Wlad's best win. Nor even mitigate his 4 losses (2 by KO). Instead, you insult me personally and this country. Pretty poor showing, to be honest.
      You couldn't dispute what I said could you?

      Wlads best win is Haye. A fighter who would have destroyed any version of Wilder because he can't box for ****.

      You're still a clown. Anyone who isn't insane will laugh at you.

      Comment

      • Sheldon312
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2016
        • 2650
        • 165
        • 65
        • 33,229

        #103
        Originally posted by Redd Foxx
        For the last 2 years I've felt Ortiz is the most talented in the division and I still feel that way. Wilder just has that Foremanesque power that can change things at any moment.
        Wlad v AJ was a good fight but Klitschko was a shell of himself by that point. I'd pick today's Ortiz to beat last year's Wlad.
        Based on what?

        Comment

        • Redd Foxx
          Hittin' the heavy bag.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2011
          • 22007
          • 1,180
          • 2,316
          • 1,257,197

          #104
          Originally posted by Sheldon312
          Based on what?
          Pick a sentence if you're going to challenge what I said.

          Comment

          • dirty fingers
            bare knuckler
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 2376
            • 265
            • 579
            • 18,282

            #105
            Originally posted by Damn Wicked
            Wladimir is way more proven than Ortiz but Ortiz is a pretty good fighter, especially for a guy approaching 40. I think Klitschko would beat Ortiz anytime over the last 12 years or so. There's no evidence to suggest Ortiz is as good as Klitschko and plenty of evidence to suggest that WK is a much better fighter. Wladimir is also bigger, faster, more athletic and much more mobile on feet.
            Yep. And Ortiz is too slow and plodding for even the 41-year old Wladimir. Jabs and straight rights would have had him out of there earlier than 10. Ortiz's stamina looked poor too.

            Comment

            • Tom Cruise
              Co.cktail
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 11442
              • 539
              • 474
              • 39,887

              #106
              Wlad from the AJ fight would be a firm firm favourite over the Ortiz from the Wilder fight.

              No question.

              What Fury did to neutralise Wlad isnt a viable tactic for 99% of the division, and definitely not Ortiz.

              Wlad would have pawed and jabbed and right crossed and clinched Ortiz to death even at 41.
              Last edited by Tom Cruise; 03-04-2018, 05:07 PM.

              Comment

              • champion4ever
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2007
                • 23912
                • 4,089
                • 7,161
                • 202,915,785

                #107
                Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                For the last 2 years I've felt Ortiz is the most talented in the division and I still feel that way. Wilder just has that Foremanesque power that can change things at any moment.
                Wlad v AJ was a good fight but Klitschko was a shell of himself by that point. I'd pick today's Ortiz to beat last year's Wlad.
                Great Point!

                Comment

                • Sheldon312
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2016
                  • 2650
                  • 165
                  • 65
                  • 33,229

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                  Pick a sentence if you're going to challenge what I said.
                  Vlad defeated fighters better than Ortiz has on his resume. Plus, hos right hand is more accurate and.just as lethal as Wilder's. I do not see how 38 year old Ortiz beats 40 year old.Vlad who looked better and almost beat a better fighter than nothing Wilder and Jennings

                  Comment

                  • Redd Foxx
                    Hittin' the heavy bag.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 22007
                    • 1,180
                    • 2,316
                    • 1,257,197

                    #109
                    Originally posted by Sheldon312
                    Vlad defeated fighters better than Ortiz has on his resume. Plus, hos right hand is more accurate and.just as lethal as Wilder's. I do not see how 38 year old Ortiz beats 40 year old.Vlad who looked better and almost beat a better fighter than nothing Wilder and Jennings
                    You ***ed yourself in the very first sentence. Look at the Jennings fights. They fought the same guy not long ago and Ortiz finished him while Wlad looked timid and hesitant. If you want to make quality comparisons, that's your best one right there.

                    You also seem to want to bring up resume. We're not debating where they were 5 or 10 years ago. We're talking about the last year and even though I'm a fan of Wlad, he faded hard after the Pulev fight.

                    I'd confidently pick Ortiz over Wlad of the past 3 years. I'd pick prime Wlad over any version of Ortiz though.
                    Last edited by Redd Foxx; 03-04-2018, 05:14 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Tom Cruise
                      Co.cktail
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 11442
                      • 539
                      • 474
                      • 39,887

                      #110
                      Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                      You ***ed yourself in the very first sentence. Look at the Jennings fight. If you want to make quality comparisons, that's your best one right there.

                      You also seem to want to bring up resume. We're not debating where they were 5 or 10 years ago. We're talking about the last year and even though I'm a fan of Wlad, he faded hard after the Pulev fight.

                      I'd confidently pick Ortiz over Wlad of the past 3 years. I'd pick prime Wlad over any version of Ortiz though.
                      One good performance doesnt make a career.

                      Ortiz was an excellent win for Wilder im not trying to crap on it, but he had not looked good in the last few years. Neither had Wlad, but Wlad was coming from a way way higher base. We are talking about a legitimate ATG

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP