Comments Thread For: Saunders To GGG: You Wanted Me When I Was Fat - Fight Me Now!

[MrClutch85]

Saunders vs GGG make it happen

[eco1]

If Saunders can run around the ring for 12 rounds without GGG catching Bj who knows what happens with a Brit set of judges? BJ is a runner and can move great. GGG is a plodder and chasing BJ would be difficult. Like grabbing water. Legit Brit is Saunders.

so u dksab!

GGG is not the plodder you think. He cuts the ring like a few. This is not Lemieux.

[slimPickings]

I guess the question is does GGG want to make history, or make money? Canelo is young, and he's not going anywhere. GGG is getting older, and his skills show some fading. I still think GGG KOs Saunders. However, I think Canelo beats GGG in a rematch. I think GGG should make history 1st, and then cash out!

History be damned.

Make the money while you can. Canelo type lottery is RARE.
Worry about history later!!

The boxing landscape is always fluid. Too many good fighters waiting in the wings. Sooner or later mandatories have to be addressed. Things can change on a dime.

And i do not think GGG beating BJS is a given let alone KO him.

Making a LOT of money against Canelo is a sure thing.
Beating BJS is not exactly a sure thing.

At least we know BJS has called him out.

Lets see what path he and his brain trust choose.

[Bronx2245]

History be damned.

Make the money while you can. Canelo type lottery is RARE.
Worry about history later!!

The boxing landscape is always fluid. Too many good fighters waiting in the wings. Sooner or later mandatories have to be addressed. Things can change on a dime.

And i do not think GGG beating BJS is a given let alone KO him.

Making a LOT of money against Canelo is a sure thing.
Beating BJS is not exactly a sure thing.

At least we know BJS has called him out.

Lets see what path he and his brain trust choose.

I think beating BJS is a sure thing! Let's not confuse Lemieux w/ GGG! There are levels to this! I feel you on the money, but Canelo will still be there. If you lose to Canelo now, you lose twice! You lose all you belts, and the chance to win all the belts! Like I sad earlier, if GGG had never had fought Canelo, I wouldn't be saying this, but he did! Now, go make history, and then cash-out!

[lopez36]

the sauders i saw last night i think could beat ggg,,,he has a great jab and seems to have good stamina too,,the only top middleweight who can give him a fight is someone who is as fast as he is,and that is jacobs,canelo might but i think saunders boxing will frustrate canelo,,,saunders although he beat a slow,limited guy in lemieux,he still showed he has skills,stamina and he's a hungry fighter out there to show everybody he's for real

[HarvardBlue]

Saunders made a strong case for himself last night but he was fighting David Lemieux. If Golovkin was as basic as Lemieux I would say Saunders will outclass him too but we're talking apples and a lemon David Lemieux

[Shrap]

Exactly.

GGG is just a better version of Cletus Seldin.

Looks great against guys who stand infront of him but would look silly against any one like BJS.

This has to be one of the dumbest things I've read on this forum, and considering the post quality here, that's saying something.

I'd like to see GGG at least take the Canelo rematch AND Saunders next year.

[SkillspayBills]

Middleweight has 6 genuinely quality fighters in GGG, Canelo, Charlo, Jacobs, Andrade, and Derevchenko(sp?). Business has picked up nicely and I am ready to see all these guys get it on.

[turnedup]

In that same size ring maybe he beats Golovkin but with no leverage beyond his belt he's going to take the money over the size of the ring. He's going to have to engage in a fight Golovkin and that outcome is hard to predict.

[satiev1]

Beats both of ggg's left overs in less impressive fashion and somehow it's a great feat.