Who is greater, Andre Ward or Timothy Bradley?
Collapse
-
Ward is much better in my opinion and I don't think it is even close. Ward fought all the top guys in his weight class and beat them all although I did think Kovalev edged him out in their first fight. I think Pacquiao easily beat Bradley all three fights. Bradley struggled with Ruslan and probably should have lost or received a draw. He was hurt badly by average Vargas. He was held to a draw by average Chavez although he should have received a ud. Bradley was a good brave boxer but he didn't perform at the consistent high level Ward did.Comment
-
Bradley is one of those guys where his general IQ is so much obviously lower than his ring/boxing IQ.
The way he showed he could box against Marquez (I thought that was pretty wide in Bradley's favour) yet chooses to wing blind haymakers against Pac and Provodnikov.Comment
-
Bradley has the deeper resume with his best wins being quite clear with the exception of Pacquiao.
Ward has 3 names - Froch, Kessler and KOvalev. Apart from Froch, he does not have a single clear win. He also wasted his prime and was not as good to watch as Bradley. Yet his achievement of being two weight lineal must be held up to a certain exact.
So they kinda even lolComment
-
so losing to a fighter three time and beating someone on roids make you a better fighter
just say you don't like ward and that why you think tim a better fighterComment
-
-
Comment
-
This thread is jokes. Ward's career and ability are a notch above.
Bradley had a very good career probably hall worthy.
Ward is an Olympic gold medallist, and one of the most accomplished 168lbers of all time.
It's a shame Ward had that massive hiatus in his career, he lost a huge chunk of his prime and I'm sure he would have added further depth to his resume, which it deserves.Comment
........
Comment