Who is greater, Andre Ward or Timothy Bradley?

[WesternChamp]

winning a gold medal & the super six was better then what Bradley has done.


Bradley was good but Ward was better

winning a gold in the AM dont really mean shiiet in the pros. and the super six tournament? lmao!!!

when its all said and done, it will show that bradley beat pac and marquez on his resume, where as for ward, winning a gold in the AM and being the winner of the super six will not even make it on his pro boxing resume.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

bradley got a w over pac the first time like it or not. and who did bradley fought that was on the juice?

none of that make him better the Ward

[VERSION1 (V1)]

winning a gold in the AM dont really mean shiiet in the pros. and the super six tournament? lmao!!!

when its all said and done, it will show that bradley beat pac and marquez on his resume, where as for ward, winning a gold in the AM and being the winner of the super six will not even make it on his pro boxing resume.

when it all said in done one is a first ballot HOF and his name is Andre Ward and one might not get in and his name is Timothy Bradley

[Willy Wanker]

I say Tim Bradley because I'm a Pactürd.

Same here. Does that mean Bradley is our Canelo?

If Bradley wins, Manny wins, when Manny wins we win doe!!!

Bradley is retired though, hopefully Manny retires too. That doesn't we can retire though, we're gonna work until we die.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

The super six was a joke. Bunch of Euro-stiffs and a few B-rate Americans. Ward still needed to cheat to win. He is a boring, dirty fighter. To each his own. Bradley is still better and more fun to watch.

Bradley was more fun to watch but was not the better all round fighter but like you said To each his own

[WesternChamp]

none of that make him better the Ward

better resume yes, better fighter no.

[GhostofDempsey]

Bradley was more fun to watch but was not the better all round fighter but like you said To each his own

How is he a better boxer when he didn't fight better opposition? Clinching, elbows, headbutts and low-blows doesn't make one a better boxer. Especially when those are the tactics needed to beat Euro-stiffs and journeymen. Honestly, Froch is his best win. Are we to believe that Froch is not an ATG and elite level boxer?

[VERSION1 (V1)]

How is he a better boxer when he didn't fight better opposition? Clinching, elbows, headbutts and low-blows doesn't make one a better boxer. Especially when those are the tactics needed to beat Euro-stiffs and journeymen. Honestly, Froch is his best win. Are we to believe that Froch is not an ATG and elite level boxer?

which one is going into the HOF first they both retired this year

[Metho_4u]

but bradley always fight like that. he'll box first but once he gets tag, then he'll brawl. no way bradley can fight a discipline fight for all 12 rounds and not get caught. he's gonna trade with ggg at one point in the fight. he always does this.

He was very disciplined vs Marquez

[Mr.Fantastic]

Bradley has the better resume and is better skillwise. The only time Bradley looked like he isn't all that skilled is when he fought with his heart. He outboxed boxers like Peterson, Marquez, and even Pacquiao(according to the ones that said he won). Ward got outboxed by Kovalev most of the rounds.