Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Finito López 51-0

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
    Exxxxactly. Only difference with he and Floyd is, Floyd's fights are more hyped. If Finito fought bums, Floyd fought bums with belts with bigger exposure and more money.
    Er, nah.

    You really actually think that Lopez is greater than Mayweather and fought better competition?

    Holy ****.

    Comment


    • can ya'll list Lopez's top 10 wins without using boxrec?..can ya'll even name 2 fighters he faced?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
        That is categorically false and everyone knows Lopez stayed in a ****ty division when all the tests were waiting for him and he never fought them.

        Simple as that.
        sounds like floyd fighting the likes of berto and mcgregor, and sparked out versions of cotto and pac and shane, when you had thurman, khan, 2009 pac before he got sparked out by marquez, cotto before he got sparked out by margarito. hell margarito, williams, lara at 154, etc. etc. etc.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
          sounds like floyd fighting the likes of berto and mcgregor, and sparked out versions of cotto and pac and shane, when you had thurman, khan, 2009 pac before he got sparked out by marquez, cotto before he got sparked out by margarito. hell margarito, williams, lara at 154, etc. etc. etc.
          Again, IRRELEVANT.

          What does anyone else have to do with the fact you just tried to claim Lopez always fought the stiffest opposition?

          It's nonsense. Your statment is pure nonsense and completely false. Plain and simple. Did not happen.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
            Er, nah.

            You really actually think that Lopez is greater than Mayweather and fought better competition?

            Holy ****.
            ain't too much that separates them imo...floyd is just better at hyping up less than stellar competition

            Comment


            • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
              ain't too much that separates them imo...floyd is just better at hyping up less than stellar competition


              That's a good joke.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                Again, IRRELEVANT.

                What does anyone else have to do with the fact you just tried to claim Lopez always fought the stiffest opposition?

                .
                ....and floyd did?...

                i just gave you a ****load of names that imo would have offered far stiffer comp than conor mcgregor and andre berto, pac that already got sparked out by marquez, cotto that already got sparked out by margarito...

                Comment


                • Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post


                  That's a good joke.
                  you bought the berto and mcrgegor fights didn't you...
                  you bought maidana 2x, that ortiz fiasco, guerrero, and that thrilla in las vegas with marquez...

                  all less than stellar comp, and you bought it, and you know that pathetic larry bought it...
                  Last edited by djtmal; 09-12-2017, 03:48 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by BoxingTrav View Post
                    Floyd asked Bob for Cotto and Margarito then DeLaHoya. This is a proven fact. The Margarito myth is a weird one with those who want to discredit Floyd. Did we not see him get outboxed easily by Daniel Santos twice. Did we not see Clottey easily outbox him until he started freaking out about his broken hand? Did we not see him lose a firefight against Paul Williams. Did we not see him get beat from pillar to post by Shane? So why in heavens name do we think he would have beaten a guy who has never lost?

                    You can not dismantle a career that we saw happen in the ring?

                    History will look at Floyd career in a great light. His career is an improbable one.

                    He is undefeated, untied. Never been dominated, never been on his behind. He has 10 years of physical superiority and 10 years as cerebral mastermind. Look at all the fighters that have come and gone in his era. Look at even the other stars from his Olympic team.

                    He signed the richest contracts, he was his own promoter.

                    It's a shame that boxing fans and boxing pundits hate him so much. This sport would be in a better place if he was given his due. Most sports celebrate their legends.
                    Bold

                    1. Your opinion.

                    2. Your assumption. I don't recall mentioning anything about the fights. A fight consists of 3 stages and you have alluded to one. Pre and Post being the other two.

                    3. Nope!
                    - adjective
                    If you describe someone or something as cerebral, you mean that they are intellectual rather than emotional.

                    4. You have generalized respected Pundits and Posters as having "hate" when they simply have a different opinion to you, which ironically is hating.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by djtmal View Post
                      ....and floyd did?...

                      i just gave you a ****load of names that imo would have offered far stiffer comp than conor mcgregor and andre berto, pac that already got sparked out by marquez, cotto that already got sparked out by margarito...
                      What Floyd did is irrelevant. How can I make that easier for you to understand?

                      You made the claim about Lopez and it was a nonsense. Simple.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP