whys rigondeaux rated so highly?
Collapse
-
-
I think it's because of the eye test. Today's era of boxing fan's don't really care about resume like the previous era of fans did. This is why Terence Crawford, Loma, GGG, and Rigo are rated so high while fighters like Thurman, Spence, and Canelo aren't rated as high even though they have better resumes than both.Comment
-
-
Nonito was never that special to me. Same as Roman, if you place them in any other weight class they would lose. Say for instance Roman was a natural welterweight, would you really pick him to beat Porter, Thurman, Brook, and Spence?Comment
-
Same goes for Jacobs, IMO. Jacobs isn't and never was anything special. That's Golovkin's biggest win, and many thought Jacobs won. The fact is Donaire was rated P4P at the time Rigo beat him. Can you name anyone on Golovkin's resume who comes even close to P4P?Comment
-
What does GGG have to do with this? I'm not even a GGG fan. I have a question, can you name anyone on Crawford's resume that was close to P4P?Comment
-
Well, I was responding to the topic starter, who is Golovkin's biggest fan. I compared the resumes of the two. For your question (a hypothetical one, mine wasn't), make a thread, I'll respond to it. If Golovkin isn't relevant here, neither is your comparison.Comment
-
GGG didn't have the talent pool to choose opponents from. Rigo has a lot of talent to choose from yet hasn't had a big win since beating an over-hyped Donaire.Comment
-
Same wiv PAC, before Floyd beat him the Floydettes were all slagging him off for years, when Floyd beat him they automatically have to defend him now to make Floyd look good! But PAC is a legend doe... He wasn't shot doe... Give me some chicken! Fried! Doeeee...
Rigo beating Donaire.. When a black dude beats him he's suddenly the greatest thing since sliced bread but I can bet you that before Donaire lost to him none of these purported Rigo fans gave a **** about Donaire!Comment
Comment