Thank you for this link. We have read it, although it appears you have not. Nowhere in the article does Golovkin say he will fight any super middleweight, at the full super middleweight limit, regardless of who they are or what the purse would be.
When asked about Ward, Golovkin says, "maybe."
The article claims that Golovkin's PROMOTER said he was willing to put Golovkin in with anyone fighting from 154-168, but that doesn't necessarily mean there wouldn't be a catchweight. Also, the things a promoter does and says when he's desperate, as he was in 2012, doesn't mean the promoter can't change his stance years later when his fighter is now a star and has more leverage.
Ward didn't want the fight at 168 when Golovkin was a nobody, Golovkin didn't want the fight at 168 when he was a somebody. If one is a ducker, so is the other. If the complaint is that Golovkin wasn't willing to make the same concessions when he was a star as he would have made when he wasn't a star, you're going to have a lot of fighters to complain about because that's how the sport has always worked.
Thank you for this link. We have read it, although it appears you have not. Golovkin says he would consider 168 for a big pay-per-view fight, not that he would fight any super middleweight regardless of the purse. Golovkin is a bigger draw on PPV than Ward. If Ward wanted the full 168 limit, he couldn't have a 50/50 split. He needed to give one one or the other once Golovkin was the bigger star. Had Ward not turned down the fight years prior, 50/50 at 168 could have happened.
This is not a criticism of Ward. Fighting Golovkin has made sense at times. Golovkin fighting Ward has made sense at times. It's never made sense for both of them at the same time, which is why the fight never happened.
Ward moved to light heavyweight a year and a half before this video. So Golovkin is ducking a guy two weight classes above him? Doesn't make any sense.
When asked about Ward, Golovkin says, "maybe."
The article claims that Golovkin's PROMOTER said he was willing to put Golovkin in with anyone fighting from 154-168, but that doesn't necessarily mean there wouldn't be a catchweight. Also, the things a promoter does and says when he's desperate, as he was in 2012, doesn't mean the promoter can't change his stance years later when his fighter is now a star and has more leverage.
Ward didn't want the fight at 168 when Golovkin was a nobody, Golovkin didn't want the fight at 168 when he was a somebody. If one is a ducker, so is the other. If the complaint is that Golovkin wasn't willing to make the same concessions when he was a star as he would have made when he wasn't a star, you're going to have a lot of fighters to complain about because that's how the sport has always worked.
Thank you for this link. We have read it, although it appears you have not. Golovkin says he would consider 168 for a big pay-per-view fight, not that he would fight any super middleweight regardless of the purse. Golovkin is a bigger draw on PPV than Ward. If Ward wanted the full 168 limit, he couldn't have a 50/50 split. He needed to give one one or the other once Golovkin was the bigger star. Had Ward not turned down the fight years prior, 50/50 at 168 could have happened.
This is not a criticism of Ward. Fighting Golovkin has made sense at times. Golovkin fighting Ward has made sense at times. It's never made sense for both of them at the same time, which is why the fight never happened.
Ward moved to light heavyweight a year and a half before this video. So Golovkin is ducking a guy two weight classes above him? Doesn't make any sense.

It happened with Kovalev before they fought, then they shut up once he beat him 2x.
That's a duck sorry but it is.
Comment