Is Wladimir Klitschko a top ten ATG heavyweight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M Bison
    Perfect, but you're not
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2012
    • 15677
    • 599
    • 798
    • 32,424

    #81
    It's a hard one to say, I think you could sneak him into the top 10, this wasn't a prime version that fought at the weekend, nor was it a prime version who fought Fury, you look at how the punch count has dwindled through the years you even somewhat see it in his fight with Bryant Jennings.

    The inevitable has happened for Wladimir, just like it happened for B-hop, this is not to say he isn't still a great fighter just like B-hop maintained to be well into his late 40's Wladimir could do the same, but at heavyweight division it's a whole different ball game, it's much harder to remain in the game as long like B-hop has done where he has feasted on plenty of feather duster type of bum fighters.
    It's a weird one really, AJ was legit more hurt in that fight than Wladimir Klitschko was and it was honestly AJ that came closer to being legitly stopped whereas Wladimir got the ole 1-2-3 British stoppage for you, to do that in your 40's what other fighters could have done that?
    Vitali Klitschko? (Very possible with his awkward style so long as he had a good punch output)
    George Foreman? (I definitely think big George would massacre a fighter like AJ)
    The point is there is not many that I can think of!
    1. Rocky Marciano
    2. Muhammad Ali
    3. Vitali Klitschko
    4. Larry Holmes
    5. Sonny Liston
    6. Lennox Lewis
    7. Gene Tunney
    8. Jack Dempsey
    9. George Foreman
    10. Wladimir Klitschko


    That's my ten, I'm happy enough with that, I also think It's time for Wladimir to call it quits no point hanging it out for as long as someone like B-hop did you only will damage your resume.

    Comment

    • Mukuro
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2015
      • 1935
      • 143
      • 72
      • 9,402

      #82
      Without a question.

      Larry Holmes couldn't carry his jockstrap.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #83
        Originally posted by Mukuro
        Without a question.
        Yes.

        Comment

        • Damn Wicked
          Sexy Mutha Fvkka
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2015
          • 6698
          • 1,122
          • 6,760
          • 46,960

          #84
          He's abso-****ing-lutely in the top ten, all time heavyweight. His skill level, his speed, power, his jab, heart, and his longevity are all testaments to his greatness. With those qualities and his size he would be a nightmare for most, if not all the top 10 fighters that are typically on these types of lists. Nostalgia has some people wetting their panties for so many of these heavyweights from the 1930's through to the 1980's.

          Comment

          • jas
            Voice of Reason
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22498
            • 932
            • 907
            • 1,059,614

            #85
            No

            great longevity, jab and footwork but head-to-head he would lose vs a lot of past heavyweights

            Had stamina issues. Only ever throws left hook, jab and straight right. Body punches and uppercuts non-existent because he is a overly cautious safety first fighter.

            Reigned a poor era.

            Comment

            • The Hammer
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 50797
              • 3,416
              • 8,704
              • 58,851

              #86
              Originally posted by Damn Wicked
              He's abso-****ing-lutely in the top ten, all time heavyweight. His skill level, his speed, power, his jab, heart, and his longevity are all testaments to his greatness. With those qualities and his size he would be a nightmare for most, if not all the top 10 fighters that are typically on these types of lists. Nostalgia has some people wetting their panties for so many of these heavyweights from the 1930's through to the 1980's.
              Very true.

              Comment

              • Kuyukut
                Lord of the North
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2011
                • 6441
                • 3,349
                • 7,169
                • 945,063

                #87
                no doubt, he's at least top 10 atg!

                Comment

                • The Hammer
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 50797
                  • 3,416
                  • 8,704
                  • 58,851

                  #88

                  Comment

                  • hugh grant
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 30092
                    • 2,143
                    • 812
                    • 105,596

                    #89
                    Originally posted by jas
                    No

                    great longevity, jab and footwork but head-to-head he would lose vs a lot of past heavyweights

                    Had stamina issues. Only ever throws left hook, jab and straight right. Body punches and uppercuts non-existent because he is a overly cautious safety first fighter.

                    Reigned a poor era.
                    Brewster, josh, sanders all beat him h2h but aren't greater. Wlad is top 10 arguably for the same reason Lennox Lewis is

                    Comment

                    • juggernaut666
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2015
                      • 15544
                      • 1,226
                      • 500
                      • 87,472

                      #90
                      Originally posted by The Time
                      My list is on par with what the views are of the boxing historians and I am a boxing historian myself.

                      There are some knowledgeable posters on here, but wow, a bunch of fan boys.

                      I always look at things in perspective, with an objective and indifferent point of view.

                      So I definitely agree with the boxing historians.

                      We can definitely agree to disagree on this.
                      You are a HISTORIAN??????

                      Listing ATG is SUBJECTIVE ,however you cant say Wlad isnt a top 10 bc he reigned so long in HIS era /broken some title defense records and that more than qualifies him no matter what !

                      The truth is anyone who voted no is either an imbecile or doesnt genuinely know better ,maybe haters as well? Pick one !
                      Last edited by juggernaut666; 05-03-2017, 12:52 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP