GGGS Resume is better than Canelos

[HeadShots]

Canelo has paid GGG to not fight him. this is the equivalent of a gangster collecting fees from the local convenience store. bullied.



Canelo has given up his title belt to GGG. that 1 explains itself.




the facts of history.


GGG TKO Canelo X2 (Forfeit)

[bigdunny1]

no i watched the fight.


canelo spent the majority of the fight evading action and on the ropes.


he gave away ring generalship on top of getting outlanded and outworked.



that is 3 of the most important scoring criterias. not 1.


so stop lying

Not according to trout if you saw the fight live the you saw the interview I posted with trouts own words telling you why he lost.



"He was the better man, quicker fighter, stronger fighter... He shocked us, I accept my defeat humbly" -Trout

Trouts opinion and assessment of the fight >>> Yours.

The man literally quit the final 3rd after knowing the score but refused to try. admitted defeat after the fight saying the difference was canelo speed and power. But an idiot like you still arguing the outcome LMAO

[The Time]

I think the quality of the resumes are not as far apart as some people think. It is fair to challenge that.

I think Jacobs and Lemiuex are better wins than a lot of GGG detractors want to admit.

Canelo's standout wins are Lara, Cotto, and Trout. They all present more difficult styles than Lemieux, but I think Jacobs is more dangerous than any of them at middleweight. I'm not trying to pump him up, I'm not a GGG fanboy. I just legit think Jacobs is a real guy. Lemieux is one dimensional, but fast and powerful. He can't be handled any better than GGG did. You can't really contest these points.

Against their other opponents, there isn't much difference in quality, and GGG generally looked more impressive against the non elite guys.

I give Canelo the nod when it comes to opposition, but it isn't by a wide margin anymore.

It's good to see things from an objective and neutrel point of view. Sometimes fans of certain fighters whether it be Triple G, Canelo, Mayweather, Pacquiao, etc....cannot see things in a neutrel or objective way or see things for what they are. Good on your part though to know that.

[bigdunny1]

most importantly, ducked GGG. that's a part of his resume. another fact of history.


GGG > Canelo

And GGG ducked Ward that's another part of his resume

[bigdunny1]

Canelo has paid GGG to not fight him. this is the equivalent of a gangster collecting fees from the local convenience store. bullied.

Another lie. Cotto paid GGG a step aside to land the Canelo fight. But Canelo hasn't paid GGG a dime. Was granted a voluntary defense by WBC and then dumped the belt. Never paid a step aside to GGG. Just stop you embarrassing yourself.

[TonyGe]

Soooo... You've got nothing but your fantasy matchups. Got it.

Which fantasy matchup are you referring to the next door neighbor or Cotto. I know Cotto won't get in the ring with Lemieux. Lemieux wont, can't drop down in weight and Cotto won't move up to fight him.

[HeadShots]

And GGG ducked Ward that's another part of his resume

nope. did GGG pay a step aside fee to Ward?

Did GGG give up a belt?


Was Ward ever a mandatory



it's like these morons can't think.

[satiev1]

Trout isn't that good. I love Miguel but quite a few beat him.

Gggs resume is better. Brook and Jacobs is better than below resume

I forgot about brooke. Brooke beats cotto and trout soundly.

[HeadShots]

Not according to trout if you saw the fight live the you saw the interview I posted with trouts own words telling you why he lost.



"He was the better man, quicker fighter, stronger fighter... He shocked us, I accept my defeat humbly" -Trout

Trouts opinion and assessment of the fight >>> Yours.

The man literally quit the final 3rd after knowing the score but refused to try. admitted defeat after the fight saying the difference was canelo speed and power. But an idiot like you still arguing the outcome LMAO

once again that is an opinion under emotional distress.



that's like when Ali said Tyson would beat him. so Tyson > Ali by Ali's own admission?


opinions are not held up to facts.


the facts are


Trout bullied Canelo on the ropes

Trout outworked Canelo

Trout outlanded Canelo



it's like you can't tell opinion and facts apart. that is troubling.

[satiev1]

Canelo resume says he has beaten more then DOUBLE the amount of world Champs as GGG. Beaten hall of famers and top P4P 10 ranked fighters. GGG hasn't faced any HOFers or top 10 p4p ranked fighters. And canelo has done all that at 26 while GGG is 35. Just off the eyeball test canelo has faced more known, higher ranked opponents then GGG. Canelo opponents have done more in the sport and received more respect and accolades for a reason. Only an idiot thinks guys like lemieux, geale, jacobs are comparable to floyd, cotto, trout, mosley, lara, etc.

Are you ****ing kidding me? Using an old mosley and old cotto who was outweighed by 20 lbs as a great win is pathetic on your part. Here we go again. Let's compare the best wins of each.

Brook beats cotto and trout. Lara is 50/50. Lemeiux beats trout lara and cotto. Jacobs beats lara trout and cotto. GGG's top 3 wins all beats canelo's top 3 wins.

Brook, lemieux, jacobs > lara trout and cotto. The truth really hurts that you have to bring up a retired mosley and a small cotto 20 lbs less to try to prove your point. ****ing sad. LOLLLLLLLLLL