Comments Thread For: Jacobs: Golovkin's Best Years Behind Him, But Still Dangerous

[IRONCHINHAGLER]

exposed against brook - hilarious!! GGG walked down Brook and basically disregarded defense....as he stated - he wanted a "street-fight" and knew Brook did not have the punch to hurt him. Against Jacobs he will use his jab and systematically and cautiously break him down in about 8 rds - similar to the way he took down Stevens and Lemieux with ease.

[Kigali]

exposed against brook - hilarious!! GGG walked down Brook and basically disregarded defense....as he stated - he wanted a "street-fight" and knew Brook did not have the punch to hurt him. Against Jacobs he will use his jab and systematically and cautiously break him down in about 8 rds - similar to the way he took down Stevens and Lemieux with ease.

They were taken down with ease by Primera and Rubio.

Primera stopped Curtis on ONE days notice

[Kigali]

Funny how fans think all fighters are the same when it comes to their longevity in the sport. Well this guy fought till he was 40 so that guy could to, as if everyone has the same genetics!

Triple G's legs look older from 2 years ago, and thats a problem because thats what holds you up when you get tagged. His punch he will keep until he's 70 but the legs are always the tell tale sign.
It's not just moving it's taking!

I remember Gaspar Ortega telling me that in his last two years he was getting knocked down by punches he would laugh ast in the past. Those punches told him he was done, no amount of training or diet can save you when your legs are GONE!

Ray

[Kigali]

All so called greats like Mayshltbird jr and Canelo among many more that "WAIT" till someone gets old is NOT a true all time great and never will be

That trash in your siggy waited until fighters got KO'd...then drained them.

[Kigali]

Jacobs struggled with Mora. His only chance is to land a perfect punch other than that it's not even going to be a competitive fight. Jacobs has a good story and seems like a nice guy but he's getting smashed come Sat. night. A focused Golovkin beats him in 3 or 4 maybe even a 1st round KO.

GGG turned down a Mora fight on HBO to fight Adama off TV....for less.

Struggling against Mora is better than ducking him to fight Adama....and get all busted up in the process..

[Sergio 1]

I think Jacobs will put Golovkin, the situation is similar to that of Klitschko-Fury.

[kafkod]

that is the ******est thing I have ever heard

what utter nonsense

you LITERALLY just stated that the WBA "No1 contender" can make title defences

what utter nonsense

Serious question: Are you autistic?

[kafkod]

if team GGG didnt want to fight Jacobs, they have a funny way of showing it. They could have just sent it to purse bid at 75/25 split and let jacobs vacate. But they didnt. They waited another 3 months, and gave him ****** money.

Yeah, those are definitely the actions of someone who doesnt want the fight.

Im done with this. Think what you like. Hopefully you honor your pledge to leave this site after saturday.

that is exactly what they did, but the WBA refused.....
http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkin-...-fight--109535

Congratulations! You have achieved something I thought was impossible .. you have surpassed Chollo Vista for mind-numbing ******ity in this thread!

The link you posted is to an article about Jacobs asking the WBA for a 60/40 split if it went to a purse bid. The WBA turned that request down:

"The possible purse bid between WBA Super World middleweight champion Gennady Golovkin and WBA World middleweight champion and Daniel Jacobs will remain at the original 75-25 split in favor of the champion (Golovkin) and not the 60-40 split requested by the challenger (Jacobs)."

http://www.wbaboxing.com/boxing-news/wba-maintains-purse-bid-split-for-golovkin-jacobs#.WMlARX9lt_k

Like OnePunch said, if GGG didn't want to fight Jacobs all he had to do was not offer him any more than 25%

I can't understand why so called boxing fans are still ****ting on him when he has gone out of his way, and given up more than he needed to give up, in order to fight the toughest opponent possible and give YOU what you said you wanted to see.

[kafkod]

No, ****** as it may sound, technically that's exactly how the WBA will count the number of title defenses, just as they have done for GGG. We can feel free to disregard them, and probably should, but that's what the record books will show.

True.

http://www.wbaboxing.com/wba-champions-profiles?id=874#.WMlGYX9lt_k

And not just the WBA, but all neutral boxing records will show Gennady's MW title reign as begining in 2010 when he beat Tapia for the WBA regular strap.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_middleweight_boxing_champions

[kafkod]

a " No1 contender ", making title defences..... is fake


even the WBA themselves admitted it earlier TODAY.....

"Mendoza wants to eliminate the issue of multiple WBA titles in every weight division. He started that mission in early 2016 and hopes to establish a single WBA champion in every weight class by the end of this year....."

http://www.boxingscene.com/leo-santa-cruz-vs-abner-mares-rematch-ordered--114617#sthash.gohVQuO4.dpuf

the media/fans should not be supporting that fake bullshht

that is not how Robinson went about his business

Golovkin needs some names, or nobody will remember him

he will just be remembered as..... that Russian guy with the fake defence record

Did Robinson have to go about his business with 4 distinct sanctioning bodies, each with multiple world title belts in every division?