Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[travestyny]

Like I said, these guys met with USADA.

So they must be all morons or its YOU!!!!
-----------------------------------------------------
Roan Jucao
✔ @jucao

aliAQUINTA DamonMartin USAntidoping UFC they was here at ATT and we argue with them. So they clearly said it isn't allowed anymore!

----------------------------------------------------------
Robert Whiteford
✔ @Flyinjudoka

USADA meeting @AmericanTopTeam today UFC fighters CANT USE IV AFTER MAKING WEIGHT,whole lot of fighters will be moving weight classes#USADA


-------------------------------------------------------
Robert Whiteford
✔ @Flyinjudoka

The trace from the plastic bag will be in your system,this could end up being more dangerous to guys that dnt know

----------------------------------------------------

Anthony Birchak was interviewed
“The way they check it is plasticides are in your urine. Basically, whatever residue is on the inside of the plastic IV bag, drains into the solution, and you p*ss
those chemicals out. That’s how they see if you’ve been using an IV.”

"but what they were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml or more out of an IV back of saline that is what dilutes your ..... "

Where does it say that WADA said they will check urine for plastics.

THEY NEVER TOLD THESE GUYS THAT AND YOU CAN'T PROVE IT! THEY WERE ASSUMING JUST LIKE YOUR DUMB ASS UNTIL I CORRECTED YOU, CLOWN.

I've told you over and over that this is not done.

The ABP is what they use to check, and no, they don't check the urine.

Therefore you are WRONG that the lab on May 1st checked for plasticizers. WADA has told you this. I've showed you what the ABP checks for. What more do you need to know that you are wrong.

If you want to argue that they can find proof in blood....no problem, as I've told you that a billion times. In Urine...not done. You were WRONG. JUST ADMIT IT AND BUZZ OFF.

[ADP02]

Once again, this is a study. You want a quote from WADA? I gave you one.

“The Athlete Biological Passport, alone or in combination with non-analytical intelligence, is a proven powerful tool to deter athletes from doping and assert anti-doping rule violations on those who cheat,” USADA officials wrote in the email.

And mine is from 2015....not 2011. Now, when are you going to show proof that they use this test that they refused to use back in 2011? I'm still waiting.

AND ARE YOU GOING TO PRETEND THAT IT DOESN'T SAY BLOOD STORAGE I've told you a billion times they are checking for a blood transfusion, you moron.

Give up.

Speaking of how many....how many excuses do you have about why Pacquaio lost?

List of people and en****** to blame for Pacquaio’s loss:

1. The referee
2. The judges
3. NSAC
4. USADA
5. The DCO
6. The The****utic Use Exemptions Committee
7. The Specific Gravity Test
8. The WADA Lab
9. WADA (?)
10. Pacquaio’s non-injured shoulder
11. The City of Las Vegas

That’s a whole lot of excuses. Are there any more?

You are pathetic.

From the Diaz case, I see that you would be doing even worse.

You cried conspiracy theories at that QUEST and NSAC plotted against Diaz. Who the freak is Diaz that they had to do that? Did they do that against Silva too?

You cannot admit that you are WRONG!!!

Luckily for Floyd, he thanked Alez Ariza. If he had you in his corner to help him out, we more than likely would be talking about how Floyd used an IV without USADA giving him a free pass with that RETRO TUE!

[ADP02]

Where does it say that WADA said they will check urine for plastics.

THEY NEVER TOLD THESE GUYS THAT AND YOU CAN'T PROVE IT! THEY WERE ASSUMING JUST LIKE YOUR DUMB ASS UNTIL I CORRECTED YOU, CLOWN.

I've told you over and over that this is not done.

The ABP is what they use to check, and no, they don't check the urine.

Therefore you are WRONG that the lab on May 1st checked for plasticizers. WADA has told you this. I've showed you what the ABP checks for. What more do you need to know that you are wrong.

If you want to argue that they can find proof in blood....no problem, as I've told you that a billion times. In Urine...not done. You were WRONG. JUST ADMIT IT AND BUZZ OFF.

So they all assumed? Which part? Only the part that you do not like? PLEASE!

They even used the words "they were also saying is" .... TRY AGAIN!

[travestyny]

From the Diaz case, I see that you would be doing even worse.

You cried conspiracy theories at that QUEST and NSAC plotted against Diaz. Who the freak is Diaz that they had to do that? Did they do that against Silva too?

You cannot admit that you are WRONG!!!

Luckily for Floyd, he thanked Alez Ariza. If he had you in his corner to help him out, we more than likely would be talking about how Floyd used an IV without USADA giving him a free pass with that RETRO TUE!

I thought you were gonna prove Ariza has a doctorate and signed off on Floyd's papers.

yea...how did that turn out for you?

I don't have to worry about admitting I'm wrong when I've utterly kicked your ass all over this thread, challenged you to a poll and/or thunderdome multiple times for all of my points and my sig...

and you tucked tail like a bltch. Didn't you?

[travestyny]

So they all assumed? Which part? Only the part that you do not like? PLEASE!

They even used the words "they were also saying is" .... TRY AGAIN!

Who is they? Who was also saying what??? When?


Do you have any links to WADA SAYING THESE THINGS? YES OR NO? I WANT LINKS BECAUSE WE KNOW HOW YOU POST FALSE INFORMATION.

[ADP02]

I thought you were gonna prove Ariza has a doctorate and signed off on Floyd's papers.

yea...how did that turn out for you?

I don't have to worry about admitting I'm wrong when I've utterly kicked your ass all over this thread, challenged you to a poll and/or thunderdome multiple times for all of my points and my sig...

and you tucked tail like a bltch. Didn't you?

The point is that Floyd thanked Dr Ariza not anyone else. Why? Because it was Ariza who thought about doing it. Why? To delay some more and make it extra sure that the urine is diluted just enough to pass the thresholds.

I showed you that even when SG is above 1.005 the concentrations of a substance can go DOWN. That can make the difference.

Then they paid off a doctor to write up a nice story just like USADA explained it to them. Or something along those lines. It took 3 weeks to make a request and how long to come to a conclusion?

NO INVESTIGATION. You saw those other athletes. All were investigated. WHO Decides who gets investigated? USADA. What a crime!!!!!!!

[travestyny]

I showed you that even when SG is above 1.005 the concentrations of a substance can go DOWN. That can make the difference.

Nice speculation.

You showed me what? Above 1.005 and the concentrations go down?

Do you mean your ******* bullshlt. LMAO. Do I really have to shlt on you again?

Go look at that study again, and come back and tell me what mistake you made. If you can't find it, I'll gladly take a steaming dump on another of your bullshlt details.

[Zaroku]

Even in slow motion PAC lost.

[travestyny]

"but what they were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml or more out of an IV back of saline that is what dilutes your ..... "

Can you show me a link with this quotation, since you keep highlighting it in red?

If you are faking another quotation, I swear, you should be banned.

[ADP02]

Who is they? Who was also saying what??? When?


Do you have any links to WADA SAYING THESE THINGS? YES OR NO? I WANT LINKS BECAUSE WE KNOW HOW YOU POST FALSE INFORMATION.

What you provided so far is 0

I gave you enough information.

Start off with Contador. Did they check for DEHP in his urine? Yes!!!!!

Did they continue to bring it up in the appeal case of Contador AFTER the study was not funded? YES!!!!

Did they continue to fund other studies? YES

Did they say this?
"we are able to detect when athletes have received a transfusion from blood bags containing di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticiser used to make transfusion blood bags more pliable. During a transfusion, significant amounts of DEHP leech into the bloodstream, the metabolites of which can be detected in the urine.

Did they say this?
Urinary DEHP metabolite measurement is a cost-effective way to detect ABT in anti-doping field even when BTHC bags are used for blood storage.


Did those athletes bring up how its tested after they met USADA? Yes

Did athletes mention that the words came from their assumption?
Anthony Birchak was interviewed
“The way they check it is plasticides are in your urine. Basically, whatever residue is on the inside of the plastic IV bag, drains into the solution, and you p*ss
those chemicals out. That’s how they see if you’ve been using an IV.”

"but what they were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml or more out of an IV back of saline that is what dilutes your ..... "