Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[travestyny]

DEFLECTION is all you can do. Unreliable numbers ....

lmao.

Unreliable huh? The GC/MS is very accurate...yet you want to talk about unreliable.


Coming from the man that said the value could be 301ng. LMAO. Somehow, I fail to see how that is certainly well above 300ng.

Coming from the man that gave a willy nilly value of 425ng when he attempted to do a calculation that was proven to be pointless, but he doesn't want to use 733ng, even though a specialist said it could be even higher than this value. He wants to believe the machine is way off...like 432ng off.

LMAO

[ADP02]

You are squirming like a bltch.

You said they test for it using a URINE TEST. You said they were afraid that the lab that did the urine test would find it and report it.

You were wrong!



Question about this:

1. Is there a link

2. Did these quotations come back to back, just like you have it presented here, or was there something in between. I want to know if he was stating it as if they said these things to him straight up or if you are just being a shlt poster like you've shown to be.

3. Did he state that he knows FOR SURE that they will do this test?

1. Here you go. I found the video.
2. no, check
3. LABs have to check lots of stuff. They do not always check for the same thing(s). But that is what I remember them saying. Its not a quote from him.


So as you can see, he does say what I highlighted.

[ADP02]

lmao.

Unreliable huh? The GC/MS is very accurate...yet you want to talk about unreliable.


Coming from the man that said the value could be 301ng. LMAO. Somehow, I fail to see how that is certainly well above 300ng.

Coming from the man that gave a willy nilly value of 425ng when he attempted to do a calculation that was proven to be pointless, but he doesn't want to use 733ng, even though a specialist said it could be even higher than this value. He wants to believe the machine is way off...like 432ng off.

LMAO

I told you before and the testimony told you that you are using a UNRELIABLE number. They told you what the reliable number is. > 300 ng/ml .... so it can be anything above that. I'm sure that its more than 301 but it certainly can be in the 400s, 500s, 600s, 700s, 800s ..... but the reliable number is > 300 ....

so if you say that it must be 733 then that is a WRONG STATEMENT.

[travestyny]

1. Here you go. I found the video.
2. no, check
3. LABs have to check lots of stuff. They do not always check for the same thing(s). But that is what I remember them saying. Its not a quote from him.


So as you can see, he does say what I highlighted.

I found it a bit before you posted this. Now let's see:

Anthony Birchak said that he would drink small viles of rehydration fluid for rehydration. He was asked if they would find plasticides in his urine from that.

ANTHONY BIRCHAK: IF they are testing for plasticides possibly....

Water's got plasticides. Pedialytes got plasticides. IF that's what they are going to be searching for....

So let me get this straight, it's your argument that he heard directly from USADA that they will test for plasticides...

yet he reveals that he will take a chance of testing positive for the plasticides and repeatedly refers to the plasticide test with IF as a preface....

You lose.

[travestyny]

I told you before and the testimony told you that you are using a UNRELIABLE number. They told you what the reliable number is. > 300 ng/ml .... so it can be anything above that. I'm sure that its more than 301 but it certainly can be in the 400s, 500s, 600s, 700s, 800s ..... but the reliable number is > 300 ....

so if you say that it must be 733 then that is a WRONG STATEMENT.

You are wrong.

They didn't just say >300

They said CERTAINLY WELL ABOVE 300.

WHAT'S CERTAINLY WELL ABOVE 300 TO YOU? DO YOU BELIEVE THE ACCURATE GC/MS WAS OFF BY 300NG? 200NG? 100NG?

LET ME KNOW, BRO!

[ADP02]

I found it a bit before you posted this. Now let's see:

Anthony Birchak said that he would drink small viles of rehydration fluid for rehydration. He was asked if they would find plasticides in his urine from that.

ANTHONY BIRCHAK: IF they are testing for plasticides possibly....

Water's got plasticides. Pedialytes got plasticides. IF that's what they are going to be searching for....

So let me get this straight, it's your argument that he heard directly from USADA that they will test for plasticides...

yet he reveals that he will take a chance of testing positive for the plasticides and repeatedly refers to the plasticide test with IF as a preface....

You lose.

Please stop deflecting. He stated what I posted previously.

He said that he will be drinking orally not by way of an IV.

[travestyny]

Please stop deflecting. He stated what I posted previously.

He said that he will be drinking orally not by way of an IV.

Did he not use the word IF twice when talking about this urine test?


yes or no?

[ADP02]

You are wrong.

They didn't just say >300

They said CERTAINLY WELL ABOVE 300.

WHAT'S CERTAINLY WELL ABOVE 300 TO YOU? DO YOU BELIEVE THE ACCURATE GC/MS WAS OFF BY 300NG? 200NG? 100NG?

LET ME KNOW, BRO!

If the reliable number was above 300, do you not think that they would be saying >400 or >500?

The testimony said >300 and called out the other number as UNRELIABLE. Stick with that and you will be good.

[travestyny]

If the reliable number was above 300, do you not think that they would be saying >400 or >500?

The testimony said >300 and called out the other number as UNRELIABLE. Stick with that and you will be good.

How accurate is this machine.

You know what? nevermind. It doesn't matter. I'll throw you a bone and say let's pretend it was 400ng.

You said 400ng can be diluted to 50ng. Ok.

Now show it to me in 75minutes with 1.009spg.

Go!

[ADP02]

Did he not use the word IF twice when talking about this urine test?


yes or no?

He was trying to differentiate between using his stuff being tested compared to someone using saline IV. Then stated that USADA said that they do more than just the plasticide test .....

So he was sure about that part because he said that that they also said .... but the other stuff he was questioning because that kind of question did not come up with USADA......

As I stated, these athletes met with USADA, as they stated in their tweets and as you heard in that interview. They all said the same thing about how they would be tested.