Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[ADP02]

SMRTL did no confirmation of the amount found? Is that right? LMAO. I guess you didn't understand what the lawyer said in this video, right? or are you playing dumb.



It begins and ends at the appropriate spots. Did you understand that? Looks like you have to admit you were WRONG yet again. This is getting dull. Seriously, go cry about Pacquaio losing somewhere else. I'm tired of destroying you.

Game Over

I just heard a few minutes. I understood what was said ..... now explain what you are trying to say?

[travestyny]

Your link was broken!




Today YOU proved my point.

YOU CANNOT ADMIT THAT YOU WERE WRONG.

You DEFLECT every time I mention USADA had to give Floyd the RETRO TUE so to say, YOU WERE WRONG .... BIG TIME!!!

If the link is broken, find it yourself clown. Unlike you, I don't fake my information.


So where is your proof that they test for plasticizers? LMAOOOOOOO. Looks like they told you they use the ABP.

So if the lab wasn't testing for plasticizers, why the paper trail, huh? You said it was because of plasticizers. WRONG!

If USADA wanted to help Floyd, they could have done it much better ways as I said.

1. Notify him of when the test was coming.
2. Stay away from the site of the IV.
3. Not making him give a urine sample from before the IV.

...anything but showing up, taking a sample from before the IV and after the IV, making him apply for the TUE, thus revealing the use of an IV to the the****utic use exemptions committee, to WADA, and to the public. You're a moron if you think the best way to help him cheat was to document all of the information that they didn't need to have out there.

You got it now, chump?

[travestyny]

I just heard a few minutes. I understood what was said ..... now explain what you are trying to say?

What the ****. Are you serious?

Now I know why you like that smiley. You been hitting the whisky too hard, foolio.

Have you gone into full troll mode or what? Dude, buzz off.

[ADP02]

IF YOU FIND IT? LMAOOOOOOO


DUDE. YOU AREN'T GOING TO FIND IT. I KNOW WHERE THE QUOTATION CAME FROM...AND IT'S NOT FROM EICHNER YOU PIECE OF SHlT.

AND I'M NOT WRONG. YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT PLASTICIZERS. THEY DON'T TEST FOR PLASTICIZERS AND THEY TOLD YOU THAT. DOES THE ABP TEST FOR PLASTICIZERS? IS THAT THE POINT OF THE ABP???


YOU ARE HOPELESS AND YOU GOT DESTROYED. GIVE UP AND BUZZ OFF.

DESTROYED is this: You said that USADA didn't need to give Floyd RETRO TUE. YOU WERE WRONG!!!


WADA as I told you uses all the tools it has in its arsenal. This can change at any given point because its a cat and mouse game but as USADA told the athletes, they do check for residue and that they combine that will other tools that they have.


Here they are confirming that what you said is wrong. They do check for DEHP.

SN: What is the objective of your study?
NL: Although we have no current direct method of detecting autologous transfusions, we are able to detect when athletes have received a transfusion from blood bags containing di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticiser used to make transfusion blood bags more pliable. During a transfusion, significant amounts of DEHP leech into the bloodstream, the metabolites of which can be detected in the urine. Athletes are now aware of this phenomenon and have started to use DEHP-free blood bags. This study is to look for biomarkers which can be used to detect prohibited autologous transfusions using DEHP-free blood bags.

SN: Can you tell us more about the study that you are carrying out?
NL: We will be testing volunteers who have received autologous transfusions from either DEHP or DEHP-free blood bags. We will be testing them at different times, and using different matrices (serum, plasma, urine) to look for a variety of biomarkers that we believe could be used for detection of transfusions with DEHP-free blood bags.

http://www.selectscience.net/selects...s/?artID=36419

[travestyny]

DESTROYED is this: You said that USADA didn't need to give Floyd RETRO TUE. YOU WERE WRONG!!!


WADA as I told you uses all the tools it has in its arsenal. This can change at any given point because its a cat and mouse game but as USADA told the athletes, they do check for residue and that they combine that will other tools that they have.


Here they are confirming that what you said is wrong. They do check for DEHP.

SN: What is the objective of your study?
NL: Although we have no current direct method of detecting autologous transfusions, we are able to detect when athletes have received a transfusion from blood bags containing di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticiser used to make transfusion blood bags more pliable. During a transfusion, significant amounts of DEHP leech into the bloodstream, the metabolites of which can be detected in the urine. Athletes are now aware of this phenomenon and have started to use DEHP-free blood bags. This study is to look for biomarkers which can be used to detect prohibited autologous transfusions using DEHP-free blood bags.

SN: Can you tell us more about the study that you are carrying out?
NL: We will be testing volunteers who have received autologous transfusions from either DEHP or DEHP-free blood bags. We will be testing them at different times, and using different matrices (serum, plasma, urine) to look for a variety of biomarkers that we believe could be used for detection of transfusions with DEHP-free blood bags.

http://www.selectscience.net/selects...s/?artID=36419

GIVE THE **** UP!

1. IS A SALINE INFUSION A BLOOD TRANSFUSION, YOU MORON?

2. WADA CLEARLY TOLD YOU THAT THEY DO NOT USE THIS URINE TEST. I'VE POINTED YOU TO THE QUOTATION NUMEROUS TIMES NOW.

YOU ARE WRONG. BOW DOWN, Bltch. IT'S OVER.

[ADP02]

GIVE THE **** UP!

1. IS A SALINE INFUSION A BLOOD TRANSFUSION, YOU MORON?

2. WADA CLEARLY TOLD YOU THAT THEY DO NOT USE THIS URINE TEST. I'VE POINTED YOU TO THE QUOTATION NUMEROUS TIMES NOW.

YOU ARE WRONG. BOW DOWN, Bltch. IT'S OVER.

YOU are too funny.

I got notifications laughing at YOU, the DEFLECTOR!!!

You think people are not noticing this about you? Just admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


I knew from reading that they have tools that they use to verify if the athlete uses an IV. While you were too busy listening to yourself (USADA didn't need to leave a paper trail).

You thought you were smart because they didn't accept funding on someone's request but as you just saw, WADA has been funding and using these types of testing tools .... These are all facts.

You made a big deal about a study not being funded and I told you that they didn't fund a "specific study" but I told you that certainly they are doing their studies to improve their testing.

Now you are lost for words and are DEFLECTING again.

Still, the point was NOT ABOUT HOW ITs being tested. I got what you were trying to do. What do I mean?

GAME: You were DEFLECTING off YOU BEING WRONG on the paper trail (BIG POINT) and trying to make the focus be something that really was not something that was ever a dispute between us or even discussed before. The way WADA LABs test to catch if an athlete uses an IV. That is not important. The important part is that it is a tool in their arsenal. As mentioned by the UFC athlete (they were told) and also WADA admits to that, as I pointed out.







so sorry to tell you AGAIN, YOU ARE WRONG, AGAIN!!!!

[travestyny]

YOU are too funny.

I got notifications laughing at YOU, the DEFLECTOR!!!

You think people are not noticing this about you? Just admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


I knew from reading that they have tools that they use to verify if the athlete uses an IV. While you were too busy listening to yourself (USADA didn't need to leave a paper trail).

You thought you were smart because they didn't accept funding on someone's request but as you just saw, WADA has been funding and using these types of testing tools .... These are all facts.

You made a big deal about a study not being funded and I told you that they didn't fund a "specific study" but I told you that certainly they are doing their studies to improve their testing.

Now you are lost for words and are DEFLECTING again.

Still, the point was NOT ABOUT HOW ITs being tested. I got what you were trying to do. What do I mean?

GAME: You were DEFLECTING off YOU BEING WRONG on the paper trail (BIG POINT) and trying to make the focus be something that really was not something that was ever a dispute between us or even discussed before. The way WADA LABs test to catch if an athlete uses an IV. That is not important. The important part is that it is a tool in their arsenal. As mentioned by the UFC athlete (they were told) and also WADA admits to that, as I pointed out.




Personally,


so sorry to tell you AGAIN, YOU ARE WRONG, AGAIN!!!!

So you want to bring up a study that was published....

ON JANUARY 1ST, 2012?????

By the way, the study was to find BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. Do you want to know what the control phase was in which no significant changes were found?

You might be surprised...


SALINE!

LMAOOOOOOOO! STOP GETTING OWNED, BlTCH. CAN YOU AT LEAST TRY?


SHOW PROOF THAT THE ATHLETE GOT THAT INFORMATION STRAIGHT FROM WADA. I DARE YOU. MAN UP, PUNK.

[ADP02]

So you want to bring up a study that was published....

ON JANUARY 1ST, 2012?????

By the way, the study was to find BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. Do you want to know what the control phase was in which no significant changes were found?

You might be surprised...


SALINE!

LMAOOOOOOOO! STOP GETTING OWNED, BlTCH. CAN YOU AT LEAST TRY?


SHOW PROOF THAT THE ATHLETE GOT THAT INFORMATION STRAIGHT FROM WADA. I DARE YOU. MAN UP, PUNK.

Sorry but you used an article from 2011 that just said that WADA will not accept funding on a requested study and your logic was this:
You concluded that WADA STOPPED testing.

See, I just should you why they freaking didn't want to fund the other study!!!!!!!!!!! KABOOOOOOOM!!!!

[travestyny]

Sorry but you used an article from 2011 that just said that WADA will not accept funding on a requested study and your logic was this:
You concluded that WADA STOPPED testing.

See, I just should you why they freaking didn't want to fund the other study!!!!!!!!!!! KABOOOOOOOM!!!!

WRONG.


How could what I show you be from 2011 when the reference was with regard to USADA taking over MMA's testing?

LMAO. You're an idiot.

[travestyny]

Sorry but you used an article from 2011 that just said that WADA will not accept funding on a requested study and your logic was this:
You concluded that WADA STOPPED testing.

See, I just should you why they freaking didn't want to fund the other study!!!!!!!!!!! KABOOOOOOOM!!!!

July, 2015

“The Athlete Biological Passport, alone or in combination with non-analytical intelligence, is a proven powerful tool to deter athletes from doping and assert anti-doping rule violations on those who cheat,” USADA officials wrote in the email.

Understand what alone or in combination with non-analytical intelligence means.


or do you need help with what OR means? LMAO!!!!

Do you need more help with ABP? Here:

2. WHAT MODULES COMPOSE THE ABP?

The ABP is currently composed of two modules:

The Haematological Module, introduced in December 2009, aims to identify enhancement of oxygen transport, including use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and any form of blood transfusion or manipulation.

The Steroidal Module, introduced on January 1st, 2014, aims to identify endogenous anabolic androgenic steroids (EAAS) when administered exogenously (i.e. not created by the human body) and other anabolic agents, such as selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS).

The Haematological Module considers a panel of biomarkers of blood doping that are measured in an athlete’s blood sample.

The Steroidal Module considers a panel of biomarkers of steroid doping measured in an athlete’s urine sample.


So......let's see what we've learned. They check the blood, not the urine, when it comes to manipulation. Did Mayweather get a blood test on May 1st or a urine test? You tell me.

LMAO. OWNED.