Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[ADP02]

So you want to bring up a study that was published....

ON JANUARY 1ST, 2012?????

By the way, the study was to find BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. Do you want to know what the control phase was in which no significant changes were found?

You might be surprised...


SALINE!

LMAOOOOOOOO! STOP GETTING OWNED, BlTCH. CAN YOU AT LEAST TRY?


SHOW PROOF THAT THE ATHLETE GOT THAT INFORMATION STRAIGHT FROM WADA. I DARE YOU. MAN UP, PUNK.

What do you do when I ask you specific questions? YOU DEFLECT!!!

After their meetings(USADA and athletes), I read several athletes come back and say something similar. That they can test the residue in the urine.


Who else do you think he meant when he said:
"They were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml"??????


Anthony Birchak was interviewed
“The way they check it is plasticides are in your urine. Basically, whatever residue is on the inside of the plastic IV bag, drains into the solution, and you p*ss
those chemicals out. That’s how they see if you’ve been using an IV.”

"but what they were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml or more out of an IV back of saline that is what dilutes your ..... "

[travestyny]

What do you do when I ask you specific questions? YOU DEFLECT!!!

After their meetings(USADA and athletes), I read several athletes come back and say something similar. That they can test the residue in the urine.


Who else do you think he meant when he said:
"They were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml"??????


Anthony Birchak was interviewed
“The way they check it is plasticides are in your urine. Basically, whatever residue is on the inside of the plastic IV bag, drains into the solution, and you p*ss
those chemicals out. That’s how they see if you’ve been using an IV.”

"but what they were also saying is that they notice that there is also more than 50ml or more out of an IV back of saline that is what dilutes your ..... "

PROVE IT. THAT'S ALL I ASKED YOU BULLSHlT ARTIST. IF YOU THINK I'M GOING TO BELIEVE YOU, WHO ALREADY FAKED A QUOTATION ONCE, YOU'RE WRONG.

PROVE WADA SAID THAT. I CAN POINT YOU TO MULTIPLE PEOPLE WHO SAY WADA DOESN'T TEST FOR PLASTICIZERS. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT...

I CAN ALSO POINT YOU TO WADA SAYING HOW THEY CHECK FOR IV. AND IT'S THE ABP! SHOWED YOU THE DIRECT QUOTATION.

YOU LOSE.

[ADP02]

WRONG.


How could what I show you be from 2011 when the reference was with regard to USADA taking over MMA's testing?

LMAO. You're an idiot.

You are losing big time here and you have the nerve to call me an idiot?


I'm talking about the initial article where someone requested that WADA fund their study. WADA didn't. You made a big story about that .... that was in 2011.

You then concluded that that meant that WADA stopped it altogether ..... I knew already that was wrong but you went there and as you can see YOU WERE WRONG!!! AGAIN!

[travestyny]

you are losing big time here and you have the nerve to call me an idiot?


I'm talking about the initial article where someone requested that wada fund their study. Wada didn't. You made a big story about that .... That was in 2011.

You then concluded that that meant that wada stopped it altogether ..... I knew already that was wrong but you went there and as you can see you were wrong!!! Again!

dude...you aren't fooling anyone. Wada doesn't check for plasticizers.

The quote from 2011 surely says they don't.

now...where is your quote that says they changed their mind? Lmaooooo. Show it fool!

[ADP02]

PROVE IT. THAT'S ALL I ASKED YOU BULLSHlT ARTIST. IF YOU THINK I'M GOING TO BELIEVE YOU, WHO ALREADY FAKED A QUOTATION ONCE, YOU'RE WRONG.

PROVE WADA SAID THAT. I CAN POINT YOU TO MULTIPLE PEOPLE WHO SAY WADA DOESN'T TEST FOR PLASTICIZERS. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT...

I CAN ALSO POINT YOU TO WADA SAYING HOW THEY CHECK FOR IV. AND IT'S THE ABP! SHOWED YOU THE DIRECT QUOTATION.

YOU LOSE.

I showed you. Even the articles and studies point to WADA still doing testing of DEHP metabolites found in urine. YOU said they do not. I told you that they can.

and I already mentioned that it really does NOT matter how WADA does it. My point all along is that they do check. THat is what I read and pointed it out to you. You then still went off into your world "UADA does not need to leave a paper trail"

You are DEFLECTING onto something that was NEVER in dispute. You are just clinging onto nothing and trying to survive.

[travestyny]

I showed you. Even the articles and studies point to WADA still doing testing of DEHP metabolites found in urine. YOU said they do not. I told you that they can.

and I already mentioned that it really does NOT matter how WADA does it. My point all along is that they do check. THat is what I read and pointed it out to you. You then still went off into your world "UADA does not need to leave a paper trail"

You are DEFLECTING onto something that was NEVER in dispute. You are just clinging onto nothing and trying to survive.

No that wasn't your point, you lying piece of shlt. Your point is that they check using a plasticizer test and you were wrong. Now you are trying to say that you knew they check with the ABP. You aren't fooling anyone. So did USADA FAKE THE RESULTS OF THE ABP???? TELL US WHAT OTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU HAVE COOKED UP TO DEAL WITH YOUR LATEST FAILURE.

[ADP02]

dude...you aren't fooling anyone. Wada doesn't check for plasticizers.

The quote from 2011 surely says they don't.

now...where is your quote that says they changed their mind? Lmaooooo. Show it fool!

The quote which expressed that to be the case because WADA didn't want to fund a study and I showed you why? WADA had other studies .....

[LoadedWraps]

WBO welterweight champion Manny Pacquiao is slated to return on April 22nd, in a fight with undefeated 2012 Australian Olympian Jeff Horn (16-0-1, 11 KOs). Pacquiao's promoter, Bob Arum of Top Rank, will be meeting with the boxer in the coming days to finalize the financial terms for the contest - which is likely to take place in Australia.
[Click Here To Read More]

[travestyny]

the quote which expressed that to be the case because wada didn't want to fund a study and i showed you why? Wada had other studies .....

Then why did you say that the lab would find plasticizers in the urine!!!!?????? THEY CLEARLY STATE THAT THEY USE THE ABP TO CHECK, AND THAT IS A BLOOD TEST TO CHECK FOR BLOOD MANIPULATION, NOT A URINE TEST. GIVE THE **** UP!

[ADP02]

No that wasn't your point, you lying piece of shlt. Your point is that they check using a plasticizer test and you were wrong. Now you are trying to say that you knew they check with the ABP. You aren't fooling anyone. So did USADA FAKE THE RESULTS OF THE ABP???? TELL US WHAT OTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU HAVE COOKED UP TO DEAL WITH YOUR LATEST FAILURE.

You say they do not but WADA LABs says that is one of their tools that they use!!!

WADA LABs use a variety of techniques. The below is but one technique.

"NL: Although we have no current direct method of detecting autologous transfusions, we are able to detect when athletes have received a transfusion from blood bags containing di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), a plasticiser used to make transfusion blood bags more pliable. During a transfusion, significant amounts of DEHP leech into the bloodstream, the metabolites of which can be detected in the urine."