Winky's legacy?

[Easy-E]

if winky was as good as some of you say, then no way in hell would he look like an amature against soliman, but winky did in fact look like an amature in their with soliman if that was pernal whitiker he would have picked off soliman so badly, soliman would be hitting air and falling on his punchs,

the same fighter that destroyed winky.....pernal whitiker beat him with ease,

and im tired of hearing the excuse of winky being young in the vasquez fight, look if winky could take a punch -vasquez punch- winky would have won, but he couldn't and got his ass kicked

and vargas, A YOUNG VARGAS! beat winky, it was only after a young vargas that had the balls to face a boxer like winky and still beat him, even while going through all kinds of legal problems and family problems, some or many of you may hate vargas but at least recognize that a young vargas gave winky hell and beat him

i'd even have quartey over winky and just maybe, maybe forest over winky

i dunno if id say vargas "gave winky hell" but it was a close fight and i wasnt suprised when he eeeked out the decision.

[Dirt E Gomez]

Vargas gave Winky hell? I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've never seen the fight if you're making that assertion.

Also, how did Winky look amateurish against King? THe man threw over a thousand punches that did approximately 0 damage to Winky. Meanwhile Winky stunned him on at least 2 occasions and proved how accurate his jab is even on a quick fighter like Sammy.

[Smokin']

Yeah, Vargas looked really confused in there. Winky did give him hell because of his awkward style.

[ferocity]

Vargas gave Winky hell? I'm going to go out on a limb and say you've never seen the fight if you're making that assertion.

Also, how did Winky look amateurish against King? THe man threw over a thousand punches that did approximately 0 damage to Winky. Meanwhile Winky stunned him on at least 2 occasions and proved how accurate his jab is even on a quick fighter like Sammy.

i seen the fight a few times after it aired just to assure myself that vargas did win

and yes, winky did look amaturish against soliman, winky was missing punchs all over the place and even going off balence, just wait till you see what a fighter like taylor does to winky

[Smokin']

Dirt E Doofus, if Soliman hit Winky with 0 punches with no effect then why did Winky's face swell up like popcorn?

[Dirt E Gomez]

Dirt E Doofus, if Soliman hit Winky with 0 punches with no effect then why did Winky's face swell up like popcorn?

My greatest and most sincere of apologies o' infallible banned one. I should've chosen my words more carefuly... he never hurt winky. A 3 year old might not be able to stun or hurt me but if I let them slap me in the face until their arm gets tired I'm probably going to be a little swelled or bruised.

[Smokin']

What's your point, Doofus? Compubox is a hoax and Soliman still outlanded/outfought Winky who is a feather fisted fighter himself. Winky was economical with his punches but you can't give them the same weight when scoring the fight if you were watching Sam Peter fight, for example.

I know it's tough for you American kids. You got all that pride. But an Aussie beat Winky all over the ring. Sorry.

[Dirt E Gomez]

What's your point, Doofus? Compubox is a hoax and Soliman still outlanded/outfought Winky who is a feather fisted fighter himself. Winky was economical with his punches but you can't give them the same weight when scoring the fight if you were watching Sam Peter fight, for example.

I know it's tough for you American kids. You got all that pride. But an Aussie beat Winky all over the ring. Sorry.

This argument will go nowhere for 2 reasons:

1. It is the equivelent of an idealogical argument since neither person is going to change how they choose to judge a fight, just as no person is going to change political parties or religions simply because somebody states a reason why they believe what they believe.

and

2. You're a moron. Comparing Sam Peter's lack of punching output to Winky's is laughable on so many levels.

[ferocity]

This argument will go nowhere for 2 reasons:

1. It is the equivelent of an idealogical argument since neither person is going to change how they choose to judge a fight, just as no person is going to change political parties or religions simply because somebody states a reason why they believe what they believe.

and

2. You're a moron. Comparing Sam Peter's lack of punching output to Winky's is laughable on so many levels.

since when did winky become a punching maching? he has never really let his hands go a lot unless he has too, he had too against soliman

[Smokin']

No, I think my argument is perfectly fine. Solimon outlanded, outfought, and outworked Winky. So who deserves the decision? Winky might of had a nicer percentage of his punches landed (according to compuhoax) but his punches do not hold the same weight because he is obviously feather fisted. If you can't get that through your thick skill then I don't know what will.