I keep saying ****, haterz keep saying I'm wrong, but I keep turning out to be 100% right. You can call names with no facts to back it up, which is called an ad hominem fallacy, but you really can't say **** because everything I say is backed up 100%.
It's all right there. Now we find out if you're a boxing fan, or a racially biased hater. Danny Jacobs wants to keep ducking GGG, and prevent the fans like you from seeing a great fight until next year at the earliest. GGG, on the other hand, is fighting for the fans. He is pushing to give you a great fight as soon as possible. Even with the WBA offer to let him delay his mandatory and fight anyone he wants, he rejected that offer and says he still wants to fight the guy who would be the best fight for the fans, even when he could fight anyone, even when the negotiation is difficult because of Haymon and Jacobs reluctance to fight the best.
It's all right there. Jacobs wants to deprive you of a great fight. GGG wants to give you that great fight. If you are a fan of boxing and great fights, then GGG will have your support in this. If you are a racially biased fan who defends ducking, then Jacobs will have your support in this. We'll find out whether you're a boxing fan, or a race fan, by how you respond to this.
Gilberto Mendoza Jr., president of the WBA, told ESPN.com that there has been discussion by the Jacobs side of a possible interim bout before facing Golovkin (36-0, 33 KOs), although Golovkin does not want an interim fight. He wants to do the mandatory fight with Jacobs (32-1, 29 KOs) as soon as possible, especially because it is such an attractive fight.
It's all right there. Jacobs wants to deprive you of a great fight. GGG wants to give you that great fight. If you are a fan of boxing and great fights, then GGG will have your support in this. If you are a racially biased fan who defends ducking, then Jacobs will have your support in this. We'll find out whether you're a boxing fan, or a race fan, by how you respond to this.
Comment