Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: The WBA Wants Deal, Gives Purse Bid Extension

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    what a fkn ****** LMAO
    I keep saying ****, haterz keep saying I'm wrong, but I keep turning out to be 100% right. You can call names with no facts to back it up, which is called an ad hominem fallacy, but you really can't say **** because everything I say is backed up 100%.

    Gilberto Mendoza Jr., president of the WBA, told ESPN.com that there has been discussion by the Jacobs side of a possible interim bout before facing Golovkin (36-0, 33 KOs), although Golovkin does not want an interim fight. He wants to do the mandatory fight with Jacobs (32-1, 29 KOs) as soon as possible, especially because it is such an attractive fight.
    It's all right there. Now we find out if you're a boxing fan, or a racially biased hater. Danny Jacobs wants to keep ducking GGG, and prevent the fans like you from seeing a great fight until next year at the earliest. GGG, on the other hand, is fighting for the fans. He is pushing to give you a great fight as soon as possible. Even with the WBA offer to let him delay his mandatory and fight anyone he wants, he rejected that offer and says he still wants to fight the guy who would be the best fight for the fans, even when he could fight anyone, even when the negotiation is difficult because of Haymon and Jacobs reluctance to fight the best.

    It's all right there. Jacobs wants to deprive you of a great fight. GGG wants to give you that great fight. If you are a fan of boxing and great fights, then GGG will have your support in this. If you are a racially biased fan who defends ducking, then Jacobs will have your support in this. We'll find out whether you're a boxing fan, or a race fan, by how you respond to this.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by World Champion? View Post
      Now I understand, and you're right, Golovkin's team has shifted their stance in a number of areas and it is frustrating to see his potential fading. Obviously the 'we fight anyone from 154-168 thing' is a myth but I don't have much of an issue with that as long as he tries to make the best fights at middleweight. When he fails to do that, it becomes difficult to follow or understand what he or his team are doing. I do think that some fighters have avoided him in the past, especially early on in his career, though he too has probably made some calculated decisions that have prevented fights from happening.

      I think each of these fighters try to make fights based on what is in their own best interest, which is understandable. The problem is when fighters use that as an excuse to hide behind their unwillingness to challenge themselves in the hope that they will glide their way to a huge payday.

      I agree that to be called a great fighter you must defeat a great fighter and it seems hardly any fighters these days are striving to be great. Though Golovkin is not the worst offender (he is at least active and makes defenses), his inability to get any big fights is frustrating.

      great post !

      likely the most accurate post that I have read from a GGG fan

      I totally agree, except I would change the bold to..... " inexplicable "

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Boxing lives View Post
        Loeffler just asked the WBA to force a purse bid early only for the WBA to tell him to quit acting like a little queef and to continue to negotiate the fight by issuing an extension. He is trying to force a purse bid so that Jacobs only gets 25% instead of sitting with the reasonable Haymon and hammering out a deal like an adult. You don't see Hearn acting this way while negotiating with Klits handlers. Thats because Hearn is trying to get Klit-Joshua made. When you are trying to get a deal done you don't go cry to the WBA for a purse bid.

        and there it is folks ^^

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
          I keep saying ****, haterz keep saying I'm wrong, but I keep turning out to be 100% right. You can call names with no facts to back it up, which is called an ad hominem fallacy, but you really can't say **** because everything I say is backed up 100%.



          It's all right there. Now we find out if you're a boxing fan, or a racially biased hater. Danny Jacobs wants to keep ducking GGG, and prevent the fans like you from seeing a great fight until next year at the earliest. GGG, on the other hand, is fighting for the fans. He is pushing to give you a great fight as soon as possible. Even with the WBA offer to let him delay his mandatory and fight anyone he wants, he rejected that offer and says he still wants to fight the guy who would be the best fight for the fans, even when he could fight anyone, even when the negotiation is difficult because of Haymon and Jacobs reluctance to fight the best.

          It's all right there. Jacobs wants to deprive you of a great fight. GGG wants to give you that great fight. If you are a fan of boxing and great fights, then GGG will have your support in this. If you are a racially biased fan who defends ducking, then Jacobs will have your support in this. We'll find out whether you're a boxing fan, or a race fan, by how you respond to this.

          I will never figure out how your little mind works..... ?

          why do you mention race in every post ?

          wtf ?

          Read this post, and STFU.....


          Originally posted by Boxing lives View Post
          Loeffler just asked the WBA to force a purse bid early only for the WBA to tell him to quit acting like a little queef and to continue to negotiate the fight by issuing an extension. He is trying to force a purse bid so that Jacobs only gets 25% instead of sitting with the reasonable Haymon and hammering out a deal like an adult. You don't see Hearn acting this way while negotiating with Klits handlers. Thats because Hearn is trying to get Klit-Joshua made. When you are trying to get a deal done you don't go cry to the WBA for a purse bid.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Boxing Logic View Post
            We'll find out whether you're a boxing fan, or a race fan, by how you respond to this.

            I don't even know what you mean..... ?

            ..... what race do you think I am ?

            ..... on what topic, does every member of a particular race agree ?

            ..... name one ?

            ..... other than that, I'm not sure how I am expected to respond..... ?

            Comment


            • Danny Jacobs, another clown, another GGG duck. There are already too many to count. Nobody EVER in the history of the sport had one of the most prestigious divisions shook as the Kazakh Warrior.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by World Champion? View Post
                Now I understand, and you're right, Golovkin's team has shifted their stance in a number of areas and it is frustrating to see his potential fading. Obviously the 'we fight anyone from 154-168 thing' is a myth but I don't have much of an issue with that as long as he tries to make the best fights at middleweight. When he fails to do that, it becomes difficult to follow or understand what he or his team are doing. I do think that some fighters have avoided him in the past, especially early on in his career, though he too has probably made some calculated decisions that have prevented fights from happening.

                I think each of these fighters try to make fights based on what is in their own best interest, which is understandable. The problem is when fighters use that as an excuse to hide behind their unwillingness to challenge themselves in the hope that they will glide their way to a huge payday.

                I agree that to be called a great fighter you must defeat a great fighter and it seems hardly any fighters these days are striving to be great. Though Golovkin is not the worst offender (he is at least active and makes defenses), his inability to get any big fights is frustrating.
                Good points. Boxing has become more business than anything else. And as you say GGG has tried to be active given the opposition willing to face him. Jacobs would be a good choice but the way it looks I'm not sure it will happen. I don't know why Jacobs won't take a 75/25 split. He gets an Otoplasty thrown in with the purse.

                Comment


                • Why would Jacobs ask for an interim bout during negotiation? If true, he and his team are clowns.

                  Comment


                  • jacobs never wanted it. everything he has done or said pointed to that. now hes just tryign to find a subtle way to drop the belt and get the hell out of there.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      I don't even know what you mean..... ?

                      ..... what race do you think I am ?

                      ..... on what topic, does every member of a particular race agree ?

                      ..... name one ?

                      ..... other than that, I'm not sure how I am expected to respond..... ?
                      Aah. The NSB ****head is back. Yes you are a ****head. Even according to yourself.

                      Are you ready for a new full day of hating?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP