Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: Loeffler Tells The WBA a Purse Bid is Needed

[yammy25]

He didn't say $3M...he said he could fight two Quillins for the money offered. Its your assumption that he meant that they offered him twice the purse he received for fighting Quillin. Is it possible that he was referring to the quality/level of opponent?

i made 1.5 mil for the quillin fight.... i could fight 2 quillins and make the same thing.

either way you look at it, whether it be money or quality of opponent he's saying he makes double the purse he got for quillin.

Im not getting involved in who i think is ducking etc... but now you're just taking the english language and trying to bend it in any way possible so its as far away removed from what it actually seems to say.

[daggum]

He didn't say $3M...he said he could fight two Quillins for the money offered. Its your assumption that he meant that they offered him twice the purse he received for fighting Quillin. Is it possible that he was referring to the quality/level of opponent?

no you are assuming danny jacobs doesn't know how to speak english correctly and doesn't know what words mean. Wait a second. I could fight two Peter Quillins and make the same thing'

[CaneloMaidana]

its golovkin propaganda. he entered jacobs body and made him say that

Golovkin is scared. It's fine.

[kafkod]

funny you should say that LMAO

lil'G just walked away from 10mil



so, lil'G can walk away from 10mil, and that aint ducking.....



I am guessing that you must be one of fanboy tards ?

So Canelo can walk away from his world title to avoid a fight, and that ain't ducking?

I guess you must be one of them ******s.

[daggum]

So Canelo can walk away from his world title to avoid a fight, and that ain't ducking?

I guess you must be one of them ******s.

canelo drops his belt to avoid a ggg fight, drains himself down a division, offers ggg a flat fee which everyone calls a duck for a huge ppv fight between 2 stars=ggg is ducking

jacobs says he will fight ggg for 3 million, gets offered 3 million, turns down fight=ggg is ducking

[-Kev-]

I thought this fight was signed and sealed...who's fault is all of this? If i's Loefller, GGG really needs to fire him. How can you let Cotto, Canelo, Jacobs all slip by?

[kafkod]

It's hilarious to see the same PBC fanboys who were sounding off about a purse bid being the best way to make a fight when Haymon called for one for Kovalev/Stevenson have now turned tail-about and lo - calling for a purse bid is now ducking!

[daggum]

I thought this fight was signed and sealed...who's fault is all of this? If i's Loefller, GGG really needs to fire him. How can you let Cotto, Canelo, Jacobs all slip by?

yes its loefflers fault that jacobs said he would fight ggg for 3 million, offered him 3 million, and jacobs turned him down.

[aboutfkntime]

Jacobs shouldn't sell himself short, and I wouldn't blame him or hold it against him if he vacates because he's obviously worth more than 25%.

But look at the situation he's in. He's a mandatory challenger for Golovkin's super title. You better believe K2's side is going to take advantage of the fact that they're entitled to 75% of the split.

Is it kinda a cheap move? It is. But let's not act like another promoter in their situation would do differently.

but this is what I took from your post......

1) "I wouldn't blame him or hold it against him if he vacates because he's obviously worth more than 25%"

I agree with that 100%

2) "K2's side is going to take advantage of the fact".....

you are correct..... but doing so, when you are WELL-AWARE that it will kill the fight, so your dividend will actually be 0..... means that YOU PASSED

there is no other logical way of looking at it

listen, I work in IT.... a major part of my job is to negotiate prices with vendors/suppliers

the fact is, I can ALWAYS screw someone down to get a better price..... by playing them off against each other, manipulating figures, etc..... I have been doing this for awhile now

to do that would be absurd, and could negatively impact my company..... because a mutually beneficial agreement is all about sustainability

so, I screwed them down in price, because they were desperate to get our business..... now they have a tiny profit margin, therefore no room to move on the exchange rate, now their support/service will be impacted as they attempt to juggle their internal resources..... now they will struggle to supply/service the numbers we need

and while this is going back and forth, it is consuming time/energy

we need our suppliers to be profitable, so that they are in a position to fulfuill/enhance their service/obligations to us...... lets say the worst happens and they go out of business, or fail to supply the agreed product.....

1) they go out of business, invalidating the warranty on all of the equipment we have purchased

2) I initiate legal action for breech of contract, possibly putting them out of business..... significantly impacting our ability to supply/service our customers...... which could have a catastrophic impact on my company

all I am saying is, you do not take advantage of somebody, just because you can..... good business is mutually beneficial, and sustainable..... like Team Golovkin mysteriously managed to do with Brook

how does killing that fight really benefit Golovkin ?

oh right, he will make the same money fighting (insert bum here)

rinse, wash, repeat

this is standard risk/reward, just like everyone else

[aboutfkntime]

It would be good for you to get in the bath tub and open your arms up with a razor blade. You are human garbage.

wow, a particularly " invested " little tard

cry b1tch LMAO