could andre ward be the next adrien broner?

[therealpugilist]

Im going to get slated for this and called a troll but have a think about it and try and remember how highly rated broner was at one point.
Broner was considered the next great american, future P4P king and was undefeated because he was fighting people smaller than him. When he moved up and started fighting people his own size, he struggled to say the least.
Andre ward was a light heavyweight as a young amateur. People usually go up in weight after the amateurs as they naturally grow, ward has gone down, At supermiddleweight, ward was able to bully opponents, Carl 'Cobra' Froch even commented on how physically strong ward was.
Only now is ward fighting at his natural weight class, which is light heavyweight. Although ward is pretty sizeable at the weight, he cant really push people about who are smaller than him (although he has tried his best to fight smaller men even at his new weight- alexander brand and paul smith who are super middleweights). So my question is, now andre ward is fighting people his own size, is he going to start struggling?

...yet this idiot has the nerve to come in and trash my threads I make(of course mostly GGG, abel sanchez or ward threads)

yet you just made the worst thread of the day


How in the hell is ward gonna be the new broner, when he was a world champion before broner, was a better amateur than broner, is more focused, and never missed weight at 168 or his catchweights below that weight in his early days



boy you reaching mightily bro

[Madison Boxing]

...yet this idiot has the nerve to come in and trash my threads I make(of course mostly GGG, abel sanchez or ward threads)

yet you just made the worst thread of the day


How in the hell is ward gonna be the new broner, when he was a world champion before broner, was a better amateur than broner, is more focused, and never missed weight at 168 or his catchweights below that weight in his early days



boy you reaching mightily bro

dont just read the title, read what ive written and have a think about it. Both men were at their best beating smaller guys, one started fighting people the same size and got exposed, it could happen to the other one.

[Madison Boxing]

its true i do know what i'm talking about(when i'm on my meds) at the same time if ward beats kovalev legit(no headbutt/clinching/robbry nonsense) it will be a great win cause kovalev is really good. the problem is if ward does all that cheating nonsense and gets away with it and wins or wins by robbery it won't matter because fanboys on here will pretend its just as meaningful as ward winning legit when real fans of boxing can see the difference. just pointing out that ward cheated or had the super six rigged in his favor makes them so angry they call you a hater. yes i hate cheaters and people who get unfair advantages. thats a bad thing?

these guys go crazy if ward gets criticised, was expecting a bad reaction, are an insecure bunch. I will be the first one to give him credit if he beats kovalev by boxing, not fouling.

[boxinggod101]

What a dumb thread lol. SOG the next Broner? Wtf u talking abt? R u that ******?

[Bardock]

these guys go crazy if ward gets criticised, was expecting a bad reaction, are an insecure bunch. I will be the first one to give him credit if he beats kovalev by boxing, not fouling.

What kind of ****** fck logic is that? By boxing.... Its up to the referee if he fouls not fanboys like you.

[Madison Boxing]

What kind of ****** fck logic is that? By boxing.... Its up to the referee if he fouls not fanboys like you.

its not the referee who throws the elbows and headbutts...

[Bardock]

its not the referee who throws the elbows and headbutts...

Well if Ward wins without being disqualified then he wins regardless of what you think. You can't erase losses just because one guy was willing to bend the rules a little bit.

Youre probably one of those Lomachenko fans who doesn't count the Salido loss because "low blows doe"

[Madison Boxing]

Well if Ward wins without being disqualified then he wins regardless of what you think. You can't erase losses just because one guy was willing to bend the rules a little bit.

Youre probably one of those Lomachenko fans who doesn't count the Salido loss because "low blows doe"

yeah i dont count it as a proper loss with lomachenko. came in overweight and cheated throughout

[Bardock]

yeah i dont count it as a proper loss with lomachenko. came in overweight and cheated throughout

Jesus Christ...... I rest my case

[therealpugilist]

dont just read the title, read what ive written and have a think about it. Both men were at their best beating smaller guys, one started fighting people the same size and got exposed, it could happen to the other one.

yea he was beating smaller guys...bwahahahahahahahahaa before he won the gold medal he competed exclusively at middleweight, and when he turned pro most of his fights were 160-168 so who are these smaller fighters he picks on

his natural weight coming in was always 160-165 until his body matured and he moved up recently.

come on man, stop reaching.