Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Coach: Only Floyd Mayweather Can Really Test GGG

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
    You didn't have that opinion of him until he lost. Where were you before that? Typical of the common idiotic boxing fan.
    How do you know that dude?

    I picked Crawford, see here:

    http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...9#post16844069

    I said Crawford will ougun Postol and that basically what happened, the fight started to be a shut out once Crawford dropped Postol.
    Postol has a 40% KO percentage...

    Don't be bhtthurt, Postol is a good boxer, a legit world champion and a nice win.

    But dominating a Postol stiff (yes I said it again) doesn't make you a favourite to beat Manny, be the next Floyd, the new P4P #1...

    I swear if GGG would beat a fighter of Postol caliber, yanks over here would call it another bum on GGG's resume.

    Postol only had "one championship" fight, beating Mathysse by KO was a statement, tough.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
      I didn't, this fight won't happen in MY opinion, but I guess Loeffler is hoping to get Nelo and Mayweather as the business man he's (or supposed to be).

      It pretty much obvious they want that big money (Floyd, Nelo).

      Those are the 2 big money fights, Ward, Ramirez, De Gale aren't AT ALL.
      The Mayweather fight is not happening. I know it, you know it, and everybody else knows it. Talking about it as if it's a possibility is based on nothing but fantasy which is exactly what you're doing.

      Waiting on a Mayweather(who's retired) fight is not an option or an excuse for Golovkin.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
        How do you know that dude?

        I picked Crawford, see here:

        http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...9#post16844069

        I said Crawford will ougun Postol and that basically what happened, the fight started to be a shut out once Crawford dropped Postol.
        Postol has a 40% KO percentage...

        Don't be bhtthurt, Postol is a good boxer, a legit world champion and a nice win.

        But dominating a Postol stiff (yes I said it again) doesn't make you a favourite to beat Manny, be the next Floyd, the new P4P #1...

        I swear if GGG would beat a fighter of Postol caliber, yanks over here would call it another bum on GGG's resume.

        Postol only had "one championship" fight, beating Mathysse by KO was a statement, tough.



        This was your comment before the fight:

        Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
        Agreed, Crawford will outgun Postol IMO.

        They both good boxers but Crawford has more power, seems to be bigger: 5 pounds heavier on the 3 weeks weigh in.



        Where in that did you call Postol a "stiff"? You didn't which is why you are an idiot for calling him a stiff because he lost the fight.

        This has nothing to do with Golovkin so why don't you give his balls a break.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
          This was your comment before the fight:






          Where in that did you call Postol a "stiff"? You didn't which is why you are an idiot for calling him a stiff because he lost the fight.

          This has nothing to do with Golovkin so why don't you give his balls a break.
          Just to tell you I never was a Postol guy and never picked him.

          I agreed Postol had no chance and stated he lacks power.

          You are obviously the idiot who can't accept a critic towards Postol.

          I'm NOT calling Postol a stiff because he lost the fight but just because he fights stiff.

          That's only the second postol fight I saw (watched him vs Mathysse).

          He's obviously a stiff fighter IMO (DO YOU DISAGREE?), and I can share my opinion, after or before the fight.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
            The Mayweather fight is not happening. I know it, you know it, and everybody else knows it. Talking about it as if it's a possibility is based on nothing but fantasy which is exactly what you're doing.
            Waiting on a Mayweather(who's retired) fight is not an option or an excuse for Golovkin.
            No, seems that what GGG team are doing.

            I wonder sometimes if Loeffler isn't living in a fantasy world (I guess it's called Switzerland).

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
              Just to tell you I never was a Postol guy and never picked him.

              I agreed Postol had no chance and stated he lacks power.


              You are obviously the idiot who can't accept a critic towards Postol.

              I'm NOT calling Postol a stiff because he lost the fight but just because he fights stiff.

              That's only the second postol fight I saw (watched him vs Mathysse).

              He's obviously a stiff fighter IMO (DO YOU DISAGREE?), and I can share my opinion, after or before the fight.
              That's not what you said at all. You said they were both "good boxers but Crawford had more power." That was it.

              Now you're being the typical idiotic boxing fan by calling Postol a "stiff" AFTER he lost the fight.


              Nothing else to see here.
              Last edited by joseph5620; 07-27-2016, 11:37 AM.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
                I didn't, this fight won't happen in MY opinion, but I guess Loeffler is hoping to get Nelo and Mayweather as the business man he's (or supposed to be).

                It pretty much obvious they want that big money (Floyd, Nelo).

                Those are the 2 big money fights, Ward, Ramirez, De Gale aren't AT ALL.

                and Brook is ?

                Brook is no bigger than Jacobs, Saunders, Eubank, Ward, Ramirez, Degale.

                There is no justification for that fight.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  and Brook is ?

                  Brook is no bigger than Jacobs, Saunders, Eubank, Ward, Ramirez, Degale.

                  There is no justification for that fight.
                  Justification? What the fuck are you talking about?

                  Golovkin signed a contract to fight Chris Eubank Jnr, who is a top 10 ranked MW. When Eubank wouldn't sign the contract himself Eddie Hearn brought Kell Brook in to replace him and Golovkin agreed to fight Kell on the same terms he was getting for Eubank.

                  This is a match between 2 undefeated world champions that sold out the 02 Arena within 11 mins of tickets going on sale. What justification is there for staging a boxing match, other than that the fighters want to do it and the fans want to watch them?

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                    Justification? What the fuck are you talking about?

                    Golovkin signed a contract to fight Chris Eubank Jnr, who is a top 10 ranked MW. When Eubank wouldn't sign the contract himself Eddie Hearn brought Kell Brook in to replace him and Golovkin agreed to fight Kell on the same terms he was getting for Eubank.

                    This is a match between 2 undefeated world champions that sold out the 02 Arena within 11 mins of tickets going on sale. What justification is there for staging a boxing match, other than that the fighters want to do it and the fans want to watch them?

                    Exactly, there is no justification whatsoever for that fight.

                    They could have simply selected someone other than Brook.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      and Brook is ?

                      Brook is no bigger than Jacobs, Saunders, Eubank, Ward, Ramirez, Degale.

                      There is no justification for that fight.
                      Brook in UK is bigger than any of those guys.

                      Brook has been on the UK scene for years facing Hatton bro, Jennings and the NDou of the world before getting the Porter's IBF belt.

                      And don't act like Brook was their first "UK choice" and like Jacobs, Saunders, Ward, Ramirez and Degale were available.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP