How do you know I'm not giving Crawford credit?
Crawford showed a classfull P4P performance.
Doesn't change the fact that Postol is a stiff IMO.
He has been in only one world championship with Mathysse, this unification fight never was that big to me.
You act like Crawford is already fighting at 147.
Crawford hasn't taking that much of risks IMO beating a blown up Gamboa and outgrowing 135.
Dude is a SMW on fight night and already was at 135.
We'll see if he's dominant at 147.
I don't think he will, but I hope he proves me wrong, I prefer his style than Thurman, Porter or Garcia's style.
You didn't have that opinion of him until he lost. Where were you before that? Typical of the common idiotic boxing fan.
I typed up a rant about all the obvious factors at play here. But, then I figured, "why bother?" At this point, there's 2 types of people in threads like this. People who respond like it's a fart in an elevator, and the others who try to convince you that it's an intoxicating aroma.
Exactly, either you're a Lil G nuthugger and will follow him into the depths of hell or you're gonna throw shade his way (which is mostly justifiable.) But either way, no opinions are being swayed in either direction... The writing is on the wall.
Tweet
Comment